Breaking News

Natchez police investigating murder-suicide  4 comments

The Miss-Lou is home to more than a dozen payday lenders

Payday loan providers offer money in a hurry

Published 12:04am Sunday, July 17, 2011

NATCHEZ — Whether its an order of fries or an advance on your next paycheck, Natchez has you covered.

The city has nearly as many payday loan providers — approximately 10 — as it does drive-thru fast food restaurants.

But that may not mean what you think, according to Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance commissioner John Allison.

“In a depressed area, there are no more (payday lenders) than in an area that is economically viable,” he said.

Allison said there is no particular concentration of payday lenders in any part of Mississippi, and there are probably 950 to 1,000 of them statewide.

And those who patron the lenders aren’t simply the economically depressed, said Jesse Whitehead, the owner of one of Vidalia’s three payday loan providers.

“You would be surprised at the people who come in,” said Whitehead, owner of Cash in a Dash.

Whitehead and other small loan business owners said public perception is that only people on the lower end of the socioeconomic scale patron the businesses.

“It’s more of a middle or working class type people using our services,” said Dan Robinson of Pearl, president of the Mississippi Check Cashers Association and owner of the Mississippi-based Cash Inc. chain.

Robinson started opening Cash Inc. offices in Mississippi in the early 1990s.

“People needed smaller (loan) amounts, not bigger amounts,” Robinson said.

Robinson said his industry has been regulated by the Center for Responsible Lending in Washington, D.C., since 1998.

“We have fewer complaints than any other regulated industry,” he said. “Out of 1.5 to 1.7 million transactions, there have been only seven formal complaints.”

Robinson said that is because the loan is straightforward.

“You have a short amount of time to pay it back, and the fee is high, but not as high as the alternatives.”

Whitehead said an overdrawn checking account could easily wind up costing more than a payday loan ever could. He also pointed out that bounced checks are often for small amounts.

“Banks charge a $25 to $35 non-sufficient funds fee for each check,” he said. “And the business where you wrote the check will charge you. But if you come in here needing $200 until payday, payback is about $45, and keeps you from bouncing three checks. But nobody sees it that way.”

Robinson added that compared to non-sufficient funds charges, credit card late fees and utility re-connection fees, taking out a payday loan can be significantly less expensive.

“This is the biggest reason people use our services — because of the cost of overdraft,” Robinson said.

Allison said the rates for payday loans seem steep because of the risk lenders take.

“To them, it’s an unsecured type loan,” Allison said. “It’s a lot of risk, that’s why it’s a high rate. But it’s a legal transaction in the State of Mississippi. You can look at it like this — they perform a service that other lenders choose not to.”

Whitehead said customers usually cite everyday expenses for reasons they need a quick loan. He said on Thursday he was able to help a customer avoid a big expense with a small loan.

“She had financed some carpet in her house a year ago for 12 months, no interest,” Whitehead said. “It came down to the last couple hundred she owed, and if she didn’t pay it on time, they would charge a $700 interest rate. So she borrowed $300 to finish paying the note, and it only cost her $50 instead of $700.”

Allison said his department regulates payday lenders and, for the most part, payday loans are fine in a pinch. Most transactions are for 14 or 30 days depending on the customer’s payroll schedule, he said.

“If the individual needs a quick boost, they should realize it’s a short term fix and not a long term solution,” Allison said. “Be cognizant of what you’re getting into.”

Angela Patterson, who operates Cash Inc. in Natchez said everyone is suffering through the current economic situation. She said her customers are also dealing with emergencies and need a small amount of cash quickly.

“A lot of people can’t walk into a bank and borrow for a light bill,” Patterson said. “Children get sick, emergencies come up at home or taxes are due. It’s a much-needed thing and helps people make it from payday to payday.”

Patterson said she suggests that customers pay off the loan and step down fee payments in $25 increments if they are having a hard time.

“If they need help or a little extended time, we try to work with the customer,” Patterson said. “If they don’t pay, I don’t run down to court. We give them every opportunity to make payments.”

Whitehead said customers “get trapped” in payday loan cycles when they patron more than one lender.

“Some people will go to every payday loan store and get themselves in a bind,” Whitehead said. “Because they have a loan at five different places, that’s five different loans that need to be paid in two weeks every month. That happens.”

Patterson agreed.

“It should be used properly, only in a time of need,” she said. “Don’t hang on to it and not pay it back.”

Still, local bankers point to the fact that the American Bankers Association offers alternatives to payday loans — the first being to establish a $500 emergency fund.

For emergencies, the ABA suggests asking an employer for a paycheck advance, obtaining a line of credit from an FDIC approved lender, asking creditors for more time to pay and using a cash advance on a credit card.

Whitehead said he has heard talk of the government shutting down the payday loan industry entirely, but that, he said would be disastrous.

“The payday loan industry is absolutely huge,” Whitehead said. “Start with the jobs lost first, not to mention the tax money that the government would be out. Everything made by a payday loan store is taxed, so on a grand scale, we’re talking billions in tax money lost also.”

Whitehead warned that a shutdown of the industry would also bolster Internet lending operations overseas, which are not regulated by U.S. laws.

  • Anonymous

    Get free samples of Emergen-C vitamin drink mix from “123 Samples” Request it and enjoy free samples of these vitamin drink mixes.

  • Anonymous

    EVENTUALLY THE CLIENT GETS INTO TROUBLE… I guess it would be ok, if this process was done responsibly. It is just a band-aid fix..
    Lots of people get into trouble doing this…

    BUCKLE UP NATCHEZ

  • Anonymous

    I cannot believe the Democrat did  free ad for these bottom-feeding low-lifes.  Shame!  They exploit people in need and get them caught in a never ending cycle of extremely high interest debt.

  • Anonymous

    I had to go to one of these lenders offices a few years back to pick up some lease paperwork, the sign posted in plain sight on the wall reflected the APR on these short term loans equalled around 1000%, yes thousand.  A bad night on the boat sure is expensive.

  • Anonymous

    These businesses should be illegal.  They feed off of the dire needs of people who are already having problems.

  • Anonymous

    This does look like a free advertisement.  Many states have passed legislation, or are in the process of doing so to protect consumers from becoming even more in debt in a neverending cycle that keeps them coming back.

  • Anonymous

    I too am a little shocked. This article gives them a certain amount of undeserved legitimacy.

  • Anonymous

    Too bad they did not show the actual interest rate you are being charged when you take out one of the loans; these places need to be regulated like credit cards and the same goes for pawn shops they need to be regulated with no interest more than 18.9% annually.

  • Anonymous

    I have always felt that these places were nothing more than legalized loan sharks. If people are not careful they can end up in worse trouble than they previously had. I do not think they should let any  loan company charge more than 20% interest on any loan. Anything more than that is highway robbery. I pretty much live by the rule that if you have to finance it or borrow to get it then you can’t afford it. Of course I am more frugal than most and generally use by debit card or cash to make purchases. i got rid of all the credit cards when they started getting crazy with the interest rates and constantly changing the credit limit. I feel if more people would stop using all these financial burdens then they would be better off and have less stress in their lives.

  • Anonymous

    OUR government has trillions of dollars worth of debt, screwing over the tax payers on a daily basis  (and on tax payers of the future) and you people are complaining about payday loan businesses?  Obviously, it’s the American way.

  • Anonymous

    Had the story been about government debt and the screwing over of taxpayers you might have a point.

  • Anonymous

    Totally Agree!  If you don’t have $120 to pay back, you certainly don’t have $120 you can borrow!  I HATE these places!  And yes, the ND should be ashamed of themselves for running an article, that’s shining these loan sharks, in a positive life.  They are in business to make money and could care less if you’re trying to catch checks, that’s your business!  I had to learn that valuable lesson when I used one.  If you are making less money than your lifestyle can afford, you need to chop down your lifestyle or increase your income!  Don’t have a bill for every dime you make!  Learn to do without except for truly needed medical care!  I think it was downright irresponsible for the Democrat to paint these businesses as some “do-gooders” for the community.  They are a business and if you wind up owing them, you’ll see just how nice they are.  They people that come in, they know they’re in dire straights.    Thankfully, I haven’t had to use these unethical vermin, since some years ago and I have NOT and WILL NOT use them again!  You will almost always wind up in a deeper mess than you were before!  What a ONE-SIDED article! 

  • Anonymous

    I think people that spout off about interest rates on short term loans are committing highway robbery by misinforming people. they call it Annual Percentage Rate for a reason people. Meaning that is the rate you pay for 12 months, 52 weeks, 365 days worth of interest.  On a loan that last 2 weeks it doesn’t add up. It’s great you feel that people should stop using these services, and I agree. People who can’t pay the loan back when it’s due according to the terms that THEY agreed to, they have no business taking out the loan.  However it is NOT the governments job to decide that for them.

  • Anonymous

    To bad you don’t understand short term credit and APR’s. 18.9% APR on a 100 loan for 2 weeks is a fee of less than $2.00. On top of that these companies are some of the most regulated in the financial industry. Depending on the state there are laws determining how long a loan can be, how many loans you can have, how much you have to make to take out a loan, how much you can borrow, that you have to prove you have a job, how many times the company can roll over or extend the loan (try to work with you to allow you to pay it off instead of default), that you must report the default to credit, that your not allowed to check credit, that you can’t report positive payment activity.

    are there people who have no business getting a short term loan… YEP. but it’s not the governments job to protect them from themselves.
    are there companies that charge more than they should… YEP. The market will bear what a customer is willing to. “trapping” people in debt they can’t pay back and that your forced to take them to court over is an expensive proposition and RARELY pays off in the end.

  • Anonymous

    See my post above about the actual APR shown on a poster in a check cashing outfit I saw showed over 1000% APR.  I could agree with your it’s not worth a $2 fee, but going from 18.9 to over 1000% stretches my imagination quite a bit.  In regard to your last sentence above, “RARELY pays off in the end”, then how are they making a profit and staying in business????? 

  • Anonymous

    Ultimate solution to this is a government lending program at say, 100% APR interest.  That would make it more reasonable to handle and the gov’t would get out of our debt crisis, plus be able to pay the unemployment claims for all those working at the check cashing outfits put out of business via this means.

    But no, taxpayers would complain loudly of the interest rate being usurious and run it out of business – so why do they ignore the check cashing outfits making over 1000% APR?

Editor's Picks