Breaking News

Natchez police investigating murder-suicide  4 comments

Examine science, Bible before vote

Published 12:07am Sunday, November 6, 2011

I have heard and read many opinions regarding Amendment 26.

Some are pro-life, praising the amendment for ending abortion; others demonize the amendment, claiming it will affect the availability of contraceptives and the function of fertility clinics, encourage murder charges for women who miscarry, and eliminate a woman’s right to choose.

These issues hinge on the one question this amendment attempts to answer for the state of Mississippi: When does life begin? This is the only issue Amendment 26 addresses. The terms abortion, contraceptive and miscarriage are missing from this amendment. In fact, it is simple in word, though mighty in implication.

Amendment 26 attempts to define personhood, stating, “The term ‘person’ or ‘persons’ shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the functional equivalent thereof.”

To make my decision about the origin of life, I turn to two sources I trust: science and the Bible.

A unique DNA blueprint, according to the world of science, is formed completely with the fertilized egg. Immediately, the cells begin building according to that DNA’s specifications. Many things are determined at this moment, from the size of the nose to the date a hairline will begin to recede. A man’s future can be read from just one cell after fertilization has occurred. Will he get cancer? Will he be predisposed to addiction? Will puberty come early or late? Will he be athletic, brainy or both? Will he live long or die early from health problems?

In some cases, DNA even decides whether the pregnancy will end in birth or miscarriage. When do we have a right to interfere with this process — quickly? — before there is a brain, heartbeat or nerve endings to feel pain? Perhaps you, too, have read abortion-promoting articles that cite the Law of Moses. There are references to this in Leviticus and Numbers:

Numbers 3:22 (NIV)

22 The number of all the males a month old or more who were counted was 7,500.

Does this verse mean that life was not counted until a child was one month old? Consider, rather, this verse in Exodus:

Exodus 21:22-25 (NIV)

22 “If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows.

23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,

24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

Many have used this phrase from scripture, “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” Few realize that it was first used in Scripture in reference to harm done to an unborn child.

So, we come to the question we each must answer on Tuesday: When does life begin? DNA is merely a blueprint, a library — it has no will of its own. It has no power to compel. So then, on whose authority do the cells in the embryo work in concert to build what has been laid out? Who is the boss? Science has ruled out the mother or father because neither of them need be present for the work to continue. So who then? The Bible tells us it was God.

Psalms 139:13-14 (NIV)

13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb.

14 I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.

If not on God’s authority, then by whose authority do the cells work? There is only one other possibility — the authority of a new living being, a unique person.

I come to these two conclusions. If you believe in the Bible, then what happens in the womb must be seen as a miracle of God. We must see His hand at work from the point of fertilization till death. Who among us would dare to tinker with God’s handiwork? If you believe in logic alone, consider the unique person acting on his/her own behalf, the person who has a life plan from fertilization to the grave. Either way, we must conclude that life begins at fertilization.

Question answered. Perhaps it isn’t the convenient answer, but it is the correct one. From fertilization to the grave, people act on their own behalf. We must conclude that life begins at fertilization.

Carl Smith

Natchez resident

  • Anonymous

    If this thing passes, all women will be required to take pregnancy tests before even the most routine medical exams and all pregnant women will have to leave the state for even the most routine medical treatment.

    But if that is God’s will, so be it. 

  • Anonymous

    VERY INTERESTED ARTICLE. IF AMENDMENT 26 IS PASSED, THE STATE OF MS. WILL ONCE AGAIN; TAKE A STEP BACKWARD; THERE’S IS NO DOUGH, THAT FERTILIZATION IS THE BEGINNING OF LIFE; FROM THE BIRTH OF AMERICA; UNTIL NOW; WE HAVE TO ASK THIS QUESTION: FROM OVER 500 YEARS, THE BIRTH OF THIS COUNTRY; HOW HAVE IT BEEN RULED ; BY THE BIBLE, OR BY MAN. THIS IS THE ONE THING THAT MAKE THE WORLD SO COMPLEX . BUT WHEN IT COME TO ISSUES LIKE AMENDMENT 26; SOME REVERT TO THE BIBLE; THIS IS WHERE SCIENCE AND BIBLE BUMP HEADS. I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE A LITTLE EXAMPLE; LET’S SAY THIS COUNTRY WAS RULED BY THE BIBLE; I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT BITS AND PIECES OF IT ; I’M TALKING ABOUT FROM THE BEGGING OF IT TO THE TO THE END. DO YOU KNOW WHAT SUPPOSE TO HAPPEN TO PEOPLES THAT : STEELS, LIE, KILL, COMMITTEE ADULTERY, GREEDY, DISRESPECT THERE PARENTS AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON; WE CAN’T JUST GO IN THE BIBLE AND PICK OUT BITS AND PIECES WHEN SOMETHING LIKE AMENDING 26 COMES UP. THERE ARE SOME THINGS IN THE BIBLE, THAT THE PASTER DON’T WANT TO SPEAK ABOUT; JUST BECAUSE IT DOESN’T FITS IN  SOCIETY. THIS, IN NO WAY, HAS ANYTHING, TO DO WITH WHAT WE BELIEVE IN OUR HEARTS.                        

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    Republicans in Ms. are trying to take rights from the women on this Int.26 so vote NO and vote democratic ladies to show these whigs your feeling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    I am sick and tired of this Bible drivel. Preach to the choir but not to me! The Bible is a book of myths and legends, truths and half truths, fact and fiction, allegories and parables, fantasies and superstitions, interpretations and reinterpretations, scribes and transcriptions compiled over a span of fifteen hundred or more years by forty or more authors few of whom ever met.

  • Anonymous

    Stream of unconsciouness.   

  • Anonymous

    Proof that government money is wasted on edumacation of the self-inflicted ignorant.

  • Anonymous

    When someone quotes the Bible in a political or science discussion just answer back with quotes from “The Big Lebowski”.  It’s no less relevant.

  • Anonymous

    Now wait just a damned minute!!!
     
    The Dude not relevant???
     
    Bowl me over – as it were.
     
    When Goodman told The Dude he could get a dismembered big toe – with nail polish – in an afternoon, I assumed that was the basis for the sequel.
     
    Man, what a downer.
     
    Of course, I’m still waiting.
     
    Oh. man.  
     
    Toe the line, Dude.

    The Dude is not relevant?

    That’s like saying Dave makes no sense!!!

  • Anonymous

    JESUS CHRIST created science & everything else in the universe, so what are you talking about?

  • Anonymous

    That is ludicrous.

  • Anonymous

    I thought that was his dad. 

  • Anonymous

    That’s what I said: the bill is ludicrous.

  • Anonymous

    The last thing this state needs is for a proposition to pass which could possibly raise birth rates in a society that is already dependent on government funding. 

  • Anonymous

    While I’m not in favor of 26, I still don’t think that abortion as a form of birth control is acceptable.  There are FAR too many other birth control options available, most at no charge.  The ends (fewer welfare recipients) do not justify the means (killing poor children in utero).

  • Anonymous

    While I agree, the means as you put it are very difficult to access in the state as it is.  To my knowledge, Ms only has two abortion clinics, which means if a woman wants to have a legal abortion they will either have to travel to one of those clinics or go out of state.   When combined with the fact that Mississippi is strongly pro life, I guess the question is why introduce something such as 26? 

  • Anonymous

    Any licensed doctor can perform an abortion if he or she is so inclined.  They do not have to take place at a special clinic.

    “When combined with the fact that Mississippi is strongly pro life, I
    guess the question is why introduce something such as 26?”

    A lame and ill-timed attempt to get the issue back in front of the Supreme Court.

  • http://www.CTKellyisnotacommonist.com Charles Thomas Kelly

    mark it an 8 dude!

  • Anonymous

    Alright, its going back in the Netflix queue!  ;-)

  • Anonymous

    Good decision. It is a film that must be viewed many times to fully appreciate its many layers of meaninglessness.

         

Editor's Picks