Breaking News

Natchez police investigating murder-suicide  4 comments

No action taken on casino yet

Published 12:05am Saturday, February 11, 2012

NATCHEZ — After spending more than an hour in a closed-door session, the Natchez Board of Aldermen took no action at a specially called meeting Friday about the second draft of the third amendment to the city’s lease with Roth Hill casino developers.

The board ultimately voted to continue the meeting until 9 a.m. Tuesday.

Natchez residents packed the Natchez City Council Chambers with standing room only for the meeting. Mayor Jake Middleton opened the meeting by asking for a motion that the board privately discuss moving the talks to executive session.

He said that while in executive session, the board would make a conference call to the city’s special legal counsel about the proposed second draft of the third lease amendment.

Ward 6 Alderman Dan Dillard said the executive session would give the board the opportunity to discuss the amendment with special counsel without the casino developers learning details of the city’s discussion with its attorney.

“This is not a sense of we’re going back there with the developers,” he said. “We’re talking to our legal counsel to understand (the amendment).”

Dillard said the more he looks at the amendment, the more complex it seems to him. He said he was convinced that it would take an attorney with gaming and real estate expertise to present the amendment to the aldermen in a way they could fully understand it.

“I hope you can understand that,” Dillard said. “We’re looking at both the long-range and short-range aspects of this.”

Ward 2 Alderman James “Ricky” Gray told Middleton he was unaware the city had officially hired an outside attorney to advise the board on the amendment.

“You need to get that straight in the minutes, because I wasn’t aware we had hired an attorney,” Gray said.

The board voted 4-1 for the determination to go into executive session, with Gray voting against the motion. Ward 1 Alderwoman Joyce Arceneaux-Mathis was not present for the vote.

After the determination, Middleton asked for a motion to go into executive session.

Dillard made the motion and added that the executive session would give the board an opportunity to finalize the employment contract with the special counsel. The board voted 4-1 to go into executive session. Gray voted against the motion.

Dillard then made a motion that the board officially hire Scott Andress of Balch & Bingham in Jackson as special counsel. The motion passed 4-1, with Gray voting against it.

Seemingly angry and confused crowd members made several comments as the board members made their way into the conference room for the executive session.

“They’re going to sell the city down the river,” one crowd member shouted.

Mathis arrived to the meeting approximately 15 minutes after the board went into executive session.

Middleton said after the executive session that the board would take no action on the amendment.

“We still have a lot of things to work out,” Middleton said. “I want you to know we asked some pretty tough questions in there because we know what your concerns are.”

The board voted to close the meeting and did not open the meeting for public comment.

Middleton said after the meeting that Andress would be at the board’s meeting on Tuesday to discuss the amendment. Middleton said Andress’ billable rate is approximately $400 an hour.

The aldermen will meet at 9 a.m. on Tuesday in the Natchez City Council Chambers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Anonymous

    “Ward 1 Alderwoman Joyce Arceneaux-Mathis was not present for the vote.”

    What? How? Why? This is incredible. What else did she have on her agenda that was more important? Did she not want to go on record “for” or “against”?

    The “Grinch” continues to show her colors.

  • Anonymous

    “Mathis arrived to the meeting approximately 15 minutes after the board went into executive session.”

    I wonder what kept her…perhaps working on the details of her suit against the City of Natchez on redistricting.

  • Anonymous

    “The board voted 4-1 for the determination to go into executive session, with Gray voting against the motion.

    “The board voted 4-1 to go into executive session. Gray voted against the motion.”

    “Dillard then made a motion that the board officially hire Scott Andress of Balch & Bingham in Jackson as special counsel. The motion passed 4-1, with Gray voting against it.”

    Old Chinese proverb…”Squeaky wheel gets grease.”

  • Anonymous

    Four hundred dollars an hour for a “special” attorney?  Better watch that legal bill closely.  And I was wondering what do we have a city attorney for?  Looks!!  How much does he get paid?  How many times does he have to get another attorney to assist him?  Just want to know.  Walter Brown never had that kind of trouble.  Finally read in the mayor’s article yesterday where the lease agreement had a million earmarked for recreation.  I hope that was the million for the “so called” civil right museum.  It would be a better use of that money so “all God’s children” could benefit.

  • Anonymous

    What affect will all the heavy traffic loads have on the bluff at that single point of access??? Loess soil cannot stand up to repeated loads/vibrations that lead to cracks where water will erode huge amounts of substructure eventually causing complete failure with little or no warning. Anyone remember the bluff failure at the old Cock-of-the-Walk under the hill? This could be catostrophic should a bluff failure happen at the proposed casino…even given the bluff reinforcement work completed several years back. The key here is….little or no warning. What then? Once gone, there can be no replacement to the bluff that now stands. Heavy truck, bus and vehicle traffic can directly lead to a tragedy beyond anyone’s imagination…a little crack here…a couple of heavy rains…another crack there…more rain….The City of Natchez should INSIST on having two points of access….OR….just don’t allow construction to proceed. Any person with common sense should be able to “see” the potential for a serious problem.
    show more

  • Anonymous

    Surely you’re not serious…to take the “million earmarked for recreation”…and spend it “for the “so called” civil right museum” is ludacrous. How would that benefit anyone except to further along the assumed arrogance that one race of people is better than others. Get over it already…this is not the 1960′s, this is 2012. If you want to go to a “civil right museum”…go to a city that already has one.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    I feel that the city should dock Sanders pay as their attorney for he isn’t helping the city. If the BOA said NO to this deal it should be over now whats the problem??!!  

  • Anonymous

    There is a major “push” to get the amended agreement through the BOA by the Mayor. Makes one wonder what lies behind the curtain.

  • Anonymous

    Never thought I’d write this, but at this moment Ricky Gray has more sense than anyone on the BOA.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    Gray needs to be a full time detailer of cars and voted off the BOA for he’s not there to benefit the city!!

  • Anonymous

    On this one, Ricky Gray was right on target! He MADE his point that a special lawyer had not been hired, and he objected to how the whole thing was being handled. I say- Good for you, Mr. Gray! If something is wrong, or being handled without knowledge of the aldermen, speak up! I could really see Mr. Gray’s disgust with the lack of communication about the attorney.
    Thanks, Mr. Gray.

  • Anonymous

    Already a full time henchman for the Grinch Mathis.

  • Anonymous

    I read the comment differently – as supporting use for recreation?

  • Anonymous

     Middleton: “I want you to know we asked some pretty tough questions in there because we know what your concerns are.”

    State “our concerns” as you “know” them, then post the tough questions you asked relevant to your knowledge, generally speaking.  

  • Anonymous

    “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”
    The man behind the curtain sayeth.  

  • Anonymous

    Is that damning with faint praise, or faintly praising the damned?

  • Anonymous

    No not spent yet for civil rights museum…but it was in the original proposal…maybe that got changed…sure hope so!!

  • Anonymous

    Fill in the blank

    “I am _____________(For/Against) using money from the casino lease to support a new civil rights museum.”

    Your second answer was as confusing as the first – maybe intentionally?

  • Anonymous

    Sorry there Old South….the first proposal published in the paper or another area mentioned that as part of the agreement there would be a million dollar donation for a civil rights museum. I wrote in some of my blogs that the money would be better spent on the recreation plans so that “all” citizens could benefit from the money. Middleton’s top of the morning a few days ago outlined what the casino was going to do and it mentioned a million dollars for recreation. No mention was made of the civil rights museum….and I hope it was taken off the table. Fear that money was going to the NAPAC museum….which I think though noble intentions …is a joke. Nobody has done an article on how much it is already funded by taxpayers…and wish they would. Personnally feel if they get the million dollars they will run thru it in a couple of years. Hope that clears some of the stuff up.

    Subject: [natchezdemocrat] Re: No action taken on casino yet

  • Anonymous

    Yep.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you, I thought that was your intent in the comments, but they could be interpreted either way.  I agree that we don’t need another civil rights museum, or more funding for the current.  There are much more pressing matters that should be handled, recreation is also low on that list for me until the full monty is exposed on funding, revenues, expenses, maintenance, insurance costs, etc. etc.  The local economy is about to drown from all the after effects of past grants that built things we must now maintain out of our pockets, and they never seem to quit coming lately..

Editor's Picks