Breaking News

Sheriff: Inmates could face capital murder charges  2 comments
PRISON UPDATE: CCA identifies deceased guard  9 comments

Board finalizes casino lease

Published 12:11am Thursday, February 16, 2012

NATCHEZ — After multiple meetings, several hours spent in closed-door sessions and weeks of community debate, the City of Natchez has finalized its lease with Roth Hill casino developers.

The Natchez Board of Aldermen voted 5-1 at a specially called meeting Wednesday to approve a third amendment to the lease.

Click here for copy of approved lease amendment

Ward 6 Alderman Dan Dillard voted against the third amendment. The board met in executive session with its outside legal  counsel, Scott Andress of Balch & Bingham, for approximately 45 minutes before the vote.

Andress briefed audience members on the provisions of the amendment after the executive session.

The provisions in the amendment include:

 A modified description of the casino site that moves the casino, on-site parking and parking garage further north.

Monthly non-refundable payments of $50,000 beginning March 1 credited toward the first $1 million rent payment due by the opening of the casino, which is tentatively scheduled for December.

A 10-percent cap on the future adjustment of the casino’s rent payment based on the Consumer Price Index.

An annual payment of $225,000 to a community development fund beginning one year after the casino opens. The payment will be adjusted according to the Consumer Price Index every five years, with a 10-percent cap on future adjustments.

The payment of the $1 million contribution for a YMCA, recreation center or Civil Rights museum to be paid over a three-year period beginning one year after the casino opens. Natchez Enterprises will also pay 5-percent interest on the last two payments that total $666,666, bringing the total contribution to $1,050,000.

The additional 100 parking spaces to be provided for the casino by the city designated by Aug. 31 and built by Dec. 7.

No mention of Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, one of the casino’s investors, as a third-party beneficiary that was in the first draft of the amendment. However, the original lease allows for the company, as a Natchez Enterprises’ investor, to be a leasehold mortgagee.

The city’s acknowledgement that Natchez Enterprises will merge into Natchez Casino OpCo, a company owned by Premier Gaming Group President Kevin Preston, George Lane of Lane Company and Robert Lubin, an attorney from Virginia.

$300,000 for the Natchez Trails Project paid on 18-month anniversary of the casino’s opening.

$300,000 to develop an area near the casino for a public park. The area will also include 50 parking spaces, but the parking will be separately funded by Natchez Enterprises.

Ward 1 Alderwoman Joyce Arceneaux-Mathis said Natchez City Engineer David Gardner requested the board allow him to combine the $300,000 contributions for the Trails and the park. Gardner said after the meeting the combined contributions will be used as a 20-percent cost match to apply for a grant to fund the expansion of the Trails Project along the river and the park as one project.

Gardner said if the city gets a grant using the combined contributions as a match, it will allow an approximately $3 million trails and park project, instead of having separate $300,000 projects.

Dillard said after the meeting he voted against the amendment because he had lost trust in the casino developers over the course of the entire development of the project.

“There was an erosion of the credibility of the developers,” he said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re back here in a few months in a similar position, so they’re going to have to regain my trust.”

Dillard said given the circumstances, he does believe the city got the best possible deal. He said he felt the community involvement and outside legal counsel was critical to the city’s beneficial lease negotiations.

Mayor Jake Middleton said after the meeting he was glad the approval process for the amendment was over. He said Andress provided the board with knowledgeable insight and advice that allowed the city to negotiate the best possible deal.

The third amendment will most likely be the final one, Middleton said. He said he believes the casino will be a project of which the city and its residents will be proud.

“I think in the end everybody can be happy,” he said. “I’m thinking positively, and if you think positive, positive things will happen.”

  • Anonymous

    . “I’m thinking positively, and if you think positive, positive things will happen.”      Now that’s something!  I think i’ll try today….

  • Anonymous

    What happens to the property should the casino shut down prior to the end of the 99 year lease?  Can the city take it back?

  • Anonymous

    First, thank you Natchez Democrat for providing a copy of the new amendment for viewing.
    Second, this whole thing has reeked and does need to be scrutinized by a justice department representative
    Third, I WILL think positive, and the positive thing that will happen is Jake will be voted out of office.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    I feel this was pushed thru to fast and I feel Jake as a lot of officials want there name on I did this in stone! I believe someone got something out of this but the taxpayers got vapor! I really feel sorry for the city folks for they did get that GI!!!

  • Anonymous

    A real tragedy occurred yesterday:  Natchez gave away it’s last remaining piece of river front property and tied it up for an unsavory purpose for the next 100 years!  But the real tragedy was that IT WAS DONE IN SECRET!  Our mayor and board of aldermen voted to meet in private executive session for four hours on one day and for another hour yesterday.  They said they couldnt let the public hear because they didn’t want the casino’s attorneys to hear their thoughts and plans to change the 3rd ammendment to the lease.  The people gave them the benefit of the doubt and waited patiently for them to present an explanation. When they came out, however. they rammed through a deal which had obviously been negotiated WITH THE CASINO ATTORNEYS!  Go figure.  

    The room was literally packed with concerned citizens, many of whom had questions.  Not a question was answered or allowed again by the aldermen in slpite of promises to do so the day before.  The bravest and only honest alderman on the board is Mr. Dillard.  He smelled a rat and was bold enough to say so.  He deserves to be reelected.  The rest of them showed their true colors and should be voted out in the next election for failure to properly represent their constituents and give them a voice. 

    We all know now how Mr. Middleton feels about the situation.  The Democrat would do us all a favor if they were to write a series that asked the other candidates for Mayor how they felt about this new casino and the way this latest deal was carried out.   

  • Anonymous

    would you feel happier taking nashville’s new 585 million dollar convention center and letting nashville have your soon to be built-for-profit casino?  convention goers  would love Natchez and maybe not get shot at, robbed or killed while they are convening.  good luck on all of your new adventures.  may the windows of heaven open  etc  etc.

  • Anonymous

    Justice Department investigation is certainly warranted…

  • Anonymous

    Rent not payed, back to city.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    ND would you please let the public know how Mrs. Ball and her assioates lawsuit is going and can they put up a injuction and stop construction of the casino and sue the BOA individually that voted yes for the amendment and what can the suit get out of it??!!! Mr. Dillard is the only one that is a man among men and should be voted back in office that stood up for the common taxpaying citizen!!  The public should haven’t been shut out of any meeting period all over what the opposition attorney might hear for this is a bunch of hogwash!!!! I live in the county and can’t vote in the city elections but if you vote to keep one of these people that voted yes you don’t give a hoot-in-H—for the city of Natchez and her future!! I’ll say it again I do seriously feel sorry for the city folks and pray Mrs. Ball attorney can kick some butt??!!!

  • Anonymous

    Yes, I agree with you somewhat, however, lets look on the positive side.  Perhaps this large plate will be an advantage for Natchez and its citizens.  If nothing else, employment will change a little.

  • Anonymous

    It takes a brave person to know that their vote will cause uproar…however, its better that he voted the way he felt rather than being coerced into voting otherwise.

  • Anonymous

    “paid.”

  • Anonymous

    So darn sorry you had to figure out what i was trying to say.didnt get much schooling i had to work for a liveing.

  • Anonymous

    So you’ve seen the word “paid” in print thousands of times and never made the connection? Subject: [natchezdemocrat] Re: Board finalizes casino lease

  • https://plus.google.com/101785462960818953428/posts Wilson Phillips

     Everyone hates spelling and grammar nazis.

  • Anonymous

    Only the ones who can’t spell and use proper English are bothered. The rest of us are OK with it. Subject: [natchezdemocrat] Re: Board finalizes casino lease

  • https://plus.google.com/101785462960818953428/posts Wilson Phillips

    Wrong. I can spell and use proper English and I am bothered by it. It makes the grammar nazi appear to be a pompous azz. I am not saying that you are, but that is the appearance that you portray when you do it. Just sayin’.

  • https://plus.google.com/101785462960818953428/posts Wilson Phillips

    Now, don’t get me wrong. When the Natchez Democrat makes spelling and grammar mistakes, I don’t have a problem with anyone pointing them out. It’s their job to get it right. People who comment on these stories, on the other hand, well that is not their job. Cut them some slack.

  • Anonymous

    Probly so ! But you need to GET A LIFE!

  • Anonymous

    “Probably.”
    Subject: [natchezdemocrat] Re: Board finalizes casino lease

  • Anonymous

    You still need to get a life!

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree with you wilson.

Editor's Picks