LAUREN WOOD / THE NATCHEZ DEMOCRAT — Armando Ricci, right, discusses the proposed budget for the Natchez-Adams County school district for the upcoming school year Thursday afternoon.

Archived Story

NASD defends proposed budget

Published 12:07am Friday, July 6, 2012

NATCHEZ — The Natchez-Adams County School District’s board of trustees defended its proposed $10,858-per-pupil budget Thursday with the argument that money can’t fix everything, but money is needed to make repairs when something is broken.corresponding

The school board’s public hearing for its proposed $39,822,109 budget for fiscal year 2013 was Thursday. The budget was reduced by approximately $1.2 million from the previous budget, NASD Business Manager Margaret Parsons said.

The proposed budget also has a request for an increase in ad valorem funding, which is generated by taxes on homes, automobile tags, business equipment and rental property.

When audience member Armando Ricci asked if enrollment in the school district had increased or declined, Parsons said current trends show the district losing approximately 100 students a year. That response drew a question from observer Lou Ellen Stout, who asked why the school district would be increasing taxes if enrollment was declining.

President Wayne Barnett said the budget has actually decreased 4 percent, but the district’s funding from outside sources has also been cut.

“Over the last nine years the state has cut the district a total of $11 million,” Barnett said. “What the school district is trying to do is maintain the same level of services without making cuts, so we are asking for more money from the local sources. We are asking for about a half million (dollars) more from the local government, because we are receiving about $2 million less from the federal and state government.”

Even though some spending can be cut, other expenses — such as teachers’ salaries and raises — are set by the state, board member Thelma Newsome said.

“We have politicians, they go all the way up to Washington, D.C., they come all the way down to Natchez — saying ‘no taxes, no taxes,’” Barnett said.

“What they do in Washington — and in Jackson — they pass laws which are unfunded mandates. They tell us what we have to do, but they don’t raise the taxes. They put that off on the local people to raise the taxes.”

But the problem is that the school district has put off maintenance on some properties because they didn’t want to raise taxes for so long that some things can no longer be avoided, Barnett said.

But properly maintaining public education is key to having a great country, he said.

“This nation is what it is today because of public education,” Barnett said.

“Public education is the reason we still are free, and we still speak English in the United States. If it wasn’t for public education, somebody else would be calling the shots.”

Board member Tim Blalock compared fixing the school district’s underperformance to renovating a house. Sometimes that involves spending some money, he said.

“I wish I could just wave a wand and everything would be fixed, but that’s not how it works,” Blalock said.

But fixing the educational system is a priority, and a key to having a functioning society, he said.

LAUREN WOOD / THE NATCHEZ DEMOCRAT — School board president Wayne Barnett talks about the presented budget for the 2012-2013 school year for the Natchez-Adams County School District Thursday afternoon during a school board meeting.

“In this country, every person who is not a convicted felon gets to vote, not just those who go to private schools,” Blalock said. “If we don’t educate everybody, the mass idiots will be making mass idiotic decisions.”

Adams County resident Gene Simonton asked the board members why the district doesn’t sell its unused or vacant properties, and Barnett said that is a decision the board would have to make in light of whether it was in the best interest of the district or not.

“I don’t want to see you raise this tax (when) we are in an economical depression,” Simonton said. “I know a lot of tired, elderly people who struggle to pay their taxes. It is thoroughly ridiculous. We need to sell some property.”

Simonton likewise asked why the school district has as many assistant administrative positions as it does, noting that when he was in school, he only had one principal.

“We had a different society that you and I lived in when we went to school,” Barnett said.

When Stout asked if the ongoing reorganization of the school district into neighborhood schools was having a positive impact on the budget, Parsons said it “absolutely” was.

“There have been a lot of positions that, as a person retired or resigned, those positions were not filled,” Parsons said. “I think we will see a lot more of that as the year goes on.”

Barnett said he acknowledged that money is not the answer, and that, if the NASD were given a letter grade rating, it would probably receive a D+.

“I don’t know about you, but I wasn’t happy when I took a D+ home,” he said.

“I won’t be satisfied until the rankings are As. I will be satisfied when the NASD gets a ranking that says we are ranked at an A level, not a B.

“People are the answer. Proper support, which may include money, includes good quality teachers, good quality administrators, good quality parents and good quality students. The only way we can get that all is to work together and realize that we are all in this together. If the ship sinks, we all sink.”

Though it did not directly address the budget, observer Lekeshia Jones asked the board a question that made them widen their eyes in surprise when she asked, “Are you aware the (new) assistant superintendent’s educational license is expired?”

The board voted Tuesday to hire Tanisha Smith as assistant superintendent at the recommendation of new Superintendent Frederick Hill. Hill and Smith worked together in the Tupelo Public School District.

Barnett said the board would look into the issue, but that the hire was ultimately made on the superintendent’s recommendation.

“The superintendent will be ultimately responsible for every person hired in this district,” board member Benny Wright said. “We have set a precedent for a superintendent who does not produce.

“We will personally hold him responsible for every person he hires.”

The consideration and adoption of the budget is on the agenda for the school board’s July 12 meeting. The adoption of the ad valorem request is on the agenda for the board’s Aug. 9 meeting.

  • Anonymous

    Almost 11 K a year and many  don,t know much when they come out> A free education thrown in the wind,letting taxpayers pick up the tab,hiring guards it,s a shame what the school systems and parenting has came to in this country.

  • Anonymous

    The money doesn’t come from “the government”, it comes from the taxpayers.  Ask your senator or congressman or president where they have been sending their kids to school.  We had a different society back then?  What does that mean?  $11k per student and abysmal scores.  Not one mention from the BOE on the real problem, babies having babies.  Address THAT issue.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    Folks that were not at the meeting need to be there next week when the school boards passes the tax increase for thats what they will do with out hesitation to voice there no to tax increase!! All they want is more and more money and with less students to increase taxes while the top brass on down to the teachers are making more money than most in Adams county that are out of work and no health insurance!! Elderly struggling to pay taxes and this bunch is raising our taxes!!! Terrible situation!!! 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1017878558 Harvey Collins

    That is just another sign that we are not a free country anymore. They can raise the millage without any oversight of the spending. The price per student is RIDICULOUS. Another failing system, Jackson Public Schools, recently raised the same issues and they have a budget that is $6900 per student. Their scores are horrid and they have the nerve to get funding for new buildings when there tax base dwindling also. Public Education Systems are NOT entitled to tax and spend without oversight as they seem to think. This argument has the Hattiesburg City Schools at odds with the tax payers right now. It is time for some new laws concerning raising any tax without public input and approval. AND WE NEED IT NOW!

  • Anonymous

    A college degree can be had with less per year than that! And this school system, just like so many others around this country, is turning out pants-dragging thugs and their baby mommas who couldn’t speak english or express a concise thought if you paid them! And the parents, in general, don’t want their children to be corrected or coerced into learning those things which are necessary to survive in the world that they will graduate into….unless they get public sector jobs which cater to that caliber of individual anyway. Public schools consistently turn out lower achieving students and it’s not because of a lack of money. It’s because there is no longer any control or disipline allowed. Can’t expell the thugs and make examples of them because that might hurt their “self-esteem”. No corporal punishment because that’s racist. Take half that amount of money and give it to private institutions or to parents who home school and watch the improvement in the student performances in 10 years…and sell the properties off and give the money back to the citizens who it rightfully belongs to anyway.

  • Anonymous

    Why does it cost over $10,000 to educate one student?  Concordia Parish is about $4,000.  Does anyone remember the study they did some years back that told our NASD was too top heavy?  Way too many people in “positions”.  Not only that, the system is real good at putting people in a position without advertising that it is available.  I know of a couple personally, someone should consider litigation.  The current NASD system does just what it wants, I have asked around with other school systems and it is against the law to fill these positions without posting them as being available.  It all depends on who you know, not who has credentials.  Even if the interim super had someone she wanted to put in, it still has to be opened up for applications.

  • Anonymous

    Babies having babies is a real and prevalent issue and the board adopted the Abstinence Only policy several weeks ago in an attempt to curtail the issue. Furthermore, on another non-related topic, it seems as if NASD’s human resources/personnel dept has serious issues in the areas of professionalism and ethics. I’m sure this young and upcoming asst. superintendent is in the process of renewing her license. When dealing with a bureaucracy of any sort, things can get a little backed up! 

  • Anonymous

    I would advise anyone who has a job that requires renewal of a license to make sure that you keep your license updated and current.This is your personal responsibility. If this is true of the new asst. superintendent, it makes one wonder about her being able to keep up with all the many changes and timelines that she will have in her job description. One question for the BOE. Does the BOE require background checks and confirmation on employees? It seems that all credentials should have been in placed before approving the recommendation. If this had been done, you would not have appeared wide eyed. Everyone must be accountable!

  • Anonymous

    I have three in private school and it cost within 500 what It cost 1 in the d+ system

  • Anonymous

    It may just be a rumor. They are in abundance! Also, they may have been wide eyed at the breach of confidentiality or lack of professionalism! I’m not sure if that is public knowledge, in the case that it is not, I would be O_O too!

  • Anonymous

    Sure cost a lot to run a day care (public school) in Natchez/Adams. The public schools are where “I don’t care” parents send their kids so someone else can take care of them for most of the day. The few, very few, students that are really there to learn are swimming against the current. Most of the “children” are only at school so they can get free breakfast and lunch and have someplace to go so “momma” won’t be hollering at them to go outside so she can sleep. She had a long night don’t you know. I really feel sorry for the few children and parents that believe in education.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/R4QFGL5AOSYJEV7ZUJKAIBY5YU Southern

    It is NOT A RUMOR…. The board is inept…. Anyone can look it up…. She has an expired “provisional” administrative license….  And he has only a AA license but is being paid for a doctorate.  Figure that!!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/R4QFGL5AOSYJEV7ZUJKAIBY5YU Southern

    FYI if you go to the professional standards website.  It is all public record.  And yes the human resources dept has a problem it is the fact that the BOARD has for two years allowed the job of the HR Director to be vacant.  Most districts this size has an HR director.  FYI the P.E. teacher at the Alternative school was threatened with non-renewal for letting his expire, but you will hire someone for a top dawg position without verification.  What is good for those in the trenches is good for those in the ivory tower  The board slept this one….. Face it!!!! 

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like you have definitely done your homework on these two individuals. Let’s hope everything was taken care of and that the attention is focused on their performance!

    I wasn’t SURE if it were public information or not, considering I wasn’t on a hunt to find their shortcomings! But thanks for the FYI, duly noted!

  • Anonymous

    Can we find their positive attributes instead of highlighting the negative ones! They are hired!!!! I wholeheartedly support two young AA in their careers!

  • Anonymous

    Screwballs vs. Crackpots

  • Anonymous

    Parents who graduated from the same schools you are bashing probably would not be a good candidate to home school their child, so why give them money to do so? If they graduated at all…..

  • Anonymous

    It is interesting that some criticize the district for being top heavy while others complain about leaving a “top” position vacant and utilizing another staffer to oversee the vacant function.  This is like damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Further to the top heavy position, it would be interesting to see information on how NASD compares to other similar sized districts in staff level positions.  Looking from the outside with some degree of knowledge, I think we are probably comparable in staffing levels.

  • Anonymous

    Southern, please reveal thy true self.  You seem to be either of two things; caring about the future of the children in NASD, or you are jealous of those that has been chosen to move the district forward.

  • Anonymous

    “jealous of those that has been”?   Shouldn’t that be “have been” as the subject and verb need to agree in tense? Or do you know what I am talking about?

Editor's Picks