Archived Story

Public fund comparison is needed

Published 12:09am Sunday, July 8, 2012

Keeping up with the Joneses is generally a dangerous pastime. Worrying over what others have is rarely productive. But occasionally, such comparisons can be useful.

Shoppers have used price comparisons for decades to determine how much of a value they’re getting for their money.

Comparing how public funds are being spent can be useful to taxpayers, too. By peeling back a layer of government and allowing taxpayers to see how their dollars are being spent, they can determine if they’re getting a good value for their taxes.

This morning, our news team looks at the salaries of Vidalia government workers and, for a quick comparison, looks at a few of those against similar City of Natchez positions.

Direct comparisons can be difficult, since each municipality is different and what is asked from each department is different, too, but some direct comparisons are fairly simple.

Police and fire personnel, for example, perform essentially identical services, but wide discrepancies exist from one side of the river to the other.

We’ve always felt that pay should increase with responsibility and risk and that similar work should yield similar pay.

For example, something seems wrong with the fact that a Vidalia meter reader earns significantly more than many Natchez police officers.

We’ve long said Natchez police are underpaid. Today’s report illustrates that in glaring detail.

Perhaps this information gives taxpayers insight into the value they receive from the cost of running local governments. As public budgets are created in the next couple of months, this information may spark some discussion that’s useful for leaders and taxpayers alike.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    Poor, poor, city folks get ready it coming!!

  • Anonymous

    “Similar work should yield similar pay.”

    The market dictates that, not a set of morals.  As long as people voluntarily take jobs in Natchez at much lower rates than they are paying in Vidalia, the market is satisfied.  The real question is not why those jobs in Vidalia pay so much more but why people still take the lower paying ones in Natchez.  If you can meet full employment with acceptable personnel at pay rate “X”, you would be stupid to raise the pay rates.

  • Anonymous

    Just a few clarifications.  You can meet full employment in Natchez with “acceptable” personnel who are friends, relatives and politically connected applicants.  That does not always meet the “best qualified” test.  The result is a lowering of standards to the “acceptable” level for those personnel to perform their work “acceptably” thus we squeak by.  A good example is the recent city audit that exposed roadblocks to the auditor obtaining the requested records for the audit.  As a result of the delays, the deadline was met “acceptably” by issuing a conditional outcome with indication the city had a break even year when they actually borrowed payday loan money to get by.  That is a symptom of an “acceptable” auditor yielding an “acceptable” audit.  As you know, most functions in Vidalia are “exceptional”, thus the pay scale there may be justified.  Look to the top for guidance.

Editor's Picks