Archived Story

Sheriff neither for or against juvenile justice supervision

Published 12:04am Saturday, August 18, 2012

NATCHEZ — Young hooligans waiting to hear about the potential closure of the Adams County’s juvenile justice detention center will have to wait a little longer.

The Adams County Board of Supervisors has discussed this week the possibility of closing the youth detention center because of concerns it is too costly to operate. County Administrator Joe Murray’s projected budget for the center next year, which he said Thursday was based on current operating expenses, is approximately $535,000.

The board was scheduled to meet and discuss the possible closure Friday, but the meeting was canceled so Youth Court Judge John Hudson and Sheriff Chuck Mayfield could meet and discuss the possibility of having the sheriff’s office take over youth detention operations, Murray said.

Currently, an administrator under the auspices of the youth court runs the youth detention center. The administrator, Glen Arnold, retired earlier this year.

Thursday Hudson told the supervisors he was willing to do whatever it takes to keep the detention center open. Hudson has maintained that closing the center would ultimately cost more than keeping it open due to transportation and housing costs at other juvenile facilities. The judge told the supervisors it is better for the community to keep its juvenile offenders in Adams County rather than sending them elsewhere, where they can learn the ills of that area.

Mayfield said Friday afternoon he had not yet had a chance to meet with Hudson, but he believed he would before the supervisors’ next meeting. The sheriff said he is not lobbying for or against having the sheriff’s office operate the center.

“The supervisors have got to make that decision what they need to do,” Mayfield said. “If they decide they are going to keep it, they are going to propose to me — I assume — that I am going to take over it.”

The sheriff said he has one employee who currently has the training to work in juvenile detention, but others would need additional certification.

“If you work in juvenile detention, you do have to have juvenile training,” Mayfield said. “It is separate, different policies and procedures for juveniles. There is a special training for that.”

Supervisor David Carter said if the center is to be kept open, the supervisors needed to make a list of expectations for the center.

At the heart of much of the discussion surrounding the center was the fact that the inmate census for the 25-bed facility is what the supervisors consider to be below a level that can justify keeping it open. Earlier this week, the census was four males.

Hudson told the supervisors the census is often low because the youth court uses detention alternatives when possible. The supervisors have said that when the center was built they were told it would house juvenile offenders from other counties, which would help subsidize its cost, and Carter said he would like to see more juveniles housed at the center.

“We have a 25-bed juvenile detention center down there, and we want to see it utilized,” he said. “We are spending almost a half million dollars a year to operate it; I am not saying that it needs to be full, but we need to utilize it more.”

Another cost associated with the center is personnel, and Supervisor Calvin Butler — who worked as a youth detention officer in the 1990s at the former youth detention center on Madison Street — said he did not think the center needed to be fully staffed if there were not inmates in an area. Butler said when he was a detention officer, it was an on-call second job.

“My shift was Monday through Friday, 3 to 11 p.m.,” Butler said. “If they didn’t have any kids at the detention center, I didn’t have to work and I didn’t get paid. If they got kids, I was on call until 11 on the weekdays.

“They were operating the facility, but at the same time they were saving money because they weren’t operating when not needed.”

The supervisors will meet at 9 a.m. Monday.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Anonymous

    A juvenile justice system with revolving doors and coloring books has no need for a detention center.  
    Taxpayers that are trained and knowledgeable re this states “stand your ground” law is needed.

  • Anonymous

    Ship them out to other communities and forget they are there.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    BOS , taxpayers want this detention shut down as well as Judge Hudson for Adams county can’t afford this big piece of pie to the bad economy budget!! We have got to grow up with values that we just can’t keep spending taxpayers money like water for obligations(detention center) thru out the years wasn’t holding their end up which is a disgrace as well as the BOS that have aspproved the budget over the years!! Thanks to Mr. Murray for blowing the whistle so shut it down!!

  • Anonymous

    Like khakirat said yesterday, let the parents of these misfits drive a few hundred miles if they want to see their precious brood.  That will get old fast.  Better get used to it, Parchman will be an even longer drive.

  • Anonymous

    If this center is too costly to operate now, how is letting the Sheriff”s office run it going to be cheaper?
    Will the $535,000 detention center costs roll into the Sheriff’s budget?

  • Anonymous

    We will need to provide a couple of Tahoes for the center help in addition to the $535K.

  • Anonymous

    WHAT THE SHERIFF REALLY NEED TO DO IS OPEN UP SOME OF THOSE COLD CASE FILES. THE SHREFF HAVE ALREADY STATED THEY ARE TO BUSY REMOVING HORSES AND COWS FROM THE ROAD SIDE. IT DON’T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF THE SHREFF IS FOR OR AGAINST JUVENILE SUPERVISION.THE BOARD NEEDS TO TELL THE SHERIFF WHAT THEY EXPECT HIM TO DO, NOT WHAT HE WANT TO DO. SOME PEOPLE HAVE NO IDEAL WHAT GOES ON WITH THERE KIDS WHEN THEY ARE HOUSED OUT OF TOWN. THAT’S NO DIFFERENCE THAN DOING AWAY WITH OUR JAILS AND PUSHING THE INMATES OFF ON SOMEONE ELSE. IF ANYTHING, WE SHOULD BE TRYING TO REACH OUT TO MORE COUNTIES TO TAKE IN THERE KIDS. THAT’S ONE WAY TO GENERATE MORE MONEY. SHAME ON THOSE THAT WANT THERE KIDS OR OTHER TO BE HOUSED SOME WHERE ELSE. DON’T EVER THINK THAT YOUR CHILD IS CRIME PROOF.     

Editor's Picks