Archived Story

Brown wants Metro officer on city beat

Published 12:14am Thursday, September 6, 2012

NATCHEZ — A desire to control expenses, better allocate resources and get a bigger slice of the seized drug money pie are factors Natchez Mayor Butch Brown gave for the city’s plan to withdraw one of its officers from the Metro Narcotics task force.

Brown informed the Adams County Board of Supervisors of the city’s plans to only provide one officer for Metro Narcotics at a joint meeting of the supervisors and Natchez Board of Aldermen Tuesday. Supervisors President Darryl Grennell and Adams County Sheriff Chuck Mayfield said Wednesday the previous day’s meeting was the first time they had heard about the city’s plan.

The city police force will be losing an officer to retirement, Brown said, and one of the Metro officers will be reassigned to wherever he is needed in the police department.

“The police chief has more need for his officer to be on board with him, and to that extent we can better use the talents we have working for the NPD than for Metro, who will still have a strong cadre of officers for the cases they are working on,” Brown said.

The original interlocal agreement that formed Metro Narcotics called for the city to supply two officers and the county through the sheriff’s department to supply one. The supervisors voted to renew the interlocal agreement Tuesday with the knowledge that the city had plans amend it.

Brown said the city’s amendments would include a reduction in the number of officers and a stipulation that the city receive a portion of seized funds.

Sheriff Chuck Mayfield said the sheriff’s office currently has four officers assigned to Metro Narcotics in addition to Commander David Lindsey. The sheriff’s office has no plan to supply another deputy to Metro Narcotics if the city pulls its officer.

“I can’t afford to do that, but we will still be working just as hard all over the city and the county,” Mayfield said. “I just don’t have anybody else right now to take that place or fill that gap.”

The sheriff said that in the last 18 months Metro Narcotics had made 372 cases, 300 of which were inside the city limits.

But Brown said the city has been picking up more and more drug cases as well.

“The information has been coming in that our (non-Metro) officers are doing drug interdictions on a weekly basis,” Brown said.

“We’ve been getting some complaints that Metro is not being as visible as it should be.”

Also at issue is $80,000 in suspected drug money that was seized during a traffic stop earlier this year. A Natchez Police officer initiated the stop, but the funds were seized by Metro because of the suspected drug connection.

Brown said the Natchez Police requested that part of those seized funds be used to buy a drug dog to be assigned to the police department, but the funds are currently being held by the district attorney’s office until they are forfeited. When the money is forfeited, it will be allocated to Metro Narcotics.

“The thing that is hard for us to understand is that we pay for two of the officers on Metro,” Brown said.

“We want a piece of the action if we are paying a piece of the program.”

The county’s drug dog, which is assigned to Metro officer Summer Moffett, is available to the city if they need it, Mayfield said.

“(The dog) is Metro’s, which means it belongs just as much to work in the city as it does in the county,” he said.

Metro has a total of $173,000 in seized funds waiting for forfeiture. Mayfield said that at the time the drug enforcement cooperative was formed, it was created in part to keep seized money in the community rather than having it remanded to the state, which happened in communities that did not have a cooperative in place.

“When Metro was created, it was agreed that the unit would be self-sufficient,” Mayfield said. “We supply the officers, but otherwise it is funded by seized money. The money is used to purchase information, evidence or equipment and training. We don’t have to go to the taxpayers and ask them for all this money.”

Brown said one difference between then and now is that the law has changed, and if the Natchez Police make a drug bust and call in the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, the MBN will keep 20 percent of seized funds and the rest is given to the police department.

“This is just another piece of the money falling through the cracks, and the city is picking up the bill on it,” Brown said.

The sheriff said he harbors no hard feelings toward the city for the decision.

“We are just going to keep rocking and doing our job as far as we are concerned,” Mayfield said. “I am still committed to drug enforcement, I think that is probably the most proactive thing we can do. I think the harder you hit that, the more you attack all crime.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Anonymous

    I agree with Chuck 100%.. Brown is showing his true colors by chasing a dollar that doesn’t belong to him, to help him balance his city budget, deficit or short fall.. Whatever you want to call it. So Butch thinks the Math should break out as such. ACSO 4 + NPD 2 = 6 — NPD’s Officers equal 33% of the so called input. Butch wants 33% of all seized funds to go to NPD, leaving ~66% to go back to Metro.. Well GUESS WHAT, all of a sudden Metro has to operate on 33% less “Revenue” and ACSO gets nothing for their deputies they supply to Metro.. This sounds like something Obama would come up with because the math makes no sense.. I think the best decision is to let Butch/NPD have both officers back and run Metro with ACSO guys.. They have done an outstanding job and rightfully so, being led by a great leader “Chuck”. I also like the way Chuck handled it, with his final statement “We are just going to keep rocking and doing our job as far as we are concerned”!!!
     

  • Anonymous

    That is the reason why police officers happen to be there is because they are the ones who know the criminals inside the city limits.
    If the police started their own drug unit, they will make more arrest , because the sheriff’s dept. on most days might have 5 calls compared to 65 or more by the police dept.. It has been that way for years & will continue to be that way. It is not that much action outside the city limits. If you do not
    believe me, get a scanner, the actions is inside the city. 

  • Anonymous

    I’m still a little off in my understanding – 75% of the arrests are made in the city limits while 66% of the cost is contributed by the county.  While this is self supported through seizures (alleged) the city should be providing 75% of the workforce.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3EO45NF2HDCA4VPTIECZX65CBA Rose T

    Let me get this straight. Cause I am not sure I understand. A joint task force Metro was put into place using officers from both NPD and ACSO. Each department pays it’s own officers. Other than that, Metro pays for itself, it’s own equipment and operating expenses from seized funds. Neither ASO or NPD receives any of the seized money. Am I right so far? ACSO has 4 men on the task force while NPD has 2. A little off balance but both departments agreed to this and still only Metro is receiving the seized funds. The only difference here is, Metro owns a dog that rides with a sheriff’s officer. Lets make it even, 3 and 3 have metro purchase one more dog and partner it with a NPD officer. Leave all the money with Metro to operate. It does not matter if the crimes happen inside the city or the county.. These men are protecting everyone in Adams County. If NPD gets money from the task force, then it is only fair that ACSO gets money too, but then Metro will not have the operating funds it needs because ACSO and NPD are taking it and The Metro Task Force would have to disband…

  • Anonymous

    Ahh, the War on Some Drugs and Things Maybe, Possibly, Related to Some Drugs.  For folks who really think the WoD is about drugs, read this article.  The WoD is about money, plain and simple.  The dealers and taxpayers have it.  Government wants it.  They even fight each other for it.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/NP3VKDFLAQGXUQUDDGNYZED7ZE phillip

    Retired? Who retired? I quit.

  • Anonymous

    Well said Crackalakin, you hit the nail on the head.

  • Anonymous

    It’s not the war on DRUGS, it’s the war on CRIME, genius….

  • Anonymous

     Circular logic and a denial of fact.  The government refers to its anti-drug measures as the “War on Drugs”.  If you have a problem with that phrase, call your Congressman.  Your circular logic lies in that the foundational part of the War on (Some) Drugs is them being made illegal, oftentimes through campaigns if misinformation and outright lies.

    If drugs were legal, would there be drug-trafficking related crime?  Of course not.  Would police be executing no-knock raids on people, shooting their dogs and sometimes them, only to later find out they had the wrong place or bad information?  No.  If one Iraqi man got wrongly killed by US forces, there was national outrage but every day Americans get their doors kicked in and lives changed forever on nothing more than the word of a paid stooge.  No outrage.

    The “War on Some Drugs and Any Cash That We Think Might Possibly in Some Way be Related to Drugs” is NOT a war on “crime”.  It is a full assault on human civil liberties and a budget-fattening revenue stream.  Who wins in this war?  Two entities.  Drug dealers and law enforcement.  Everyone else suffers.

  • Anonymous

    prisons are a big industry,the owners like the  money their making,no matter who suffers,as long as they are paid.

  • Anonymous

    The first four words sum it up for Hizzoner, “A desire to control”.

Editor's Picks

fathers