Breaking News

Judge denies Manning new trial in 1993 slayings

LAUREN WOOD/THE NATCHEZ DEMOCRAT — Mike Fields looks at the empty bread shelves Saturday morning at the Holsum bread store in Natchez. The store had sold out of its last stock of bread earlier in the morning due to the closing of Hostess.

Archived Story

It’s not just about Twinkies: Local store closes, restaurants short on bread

Published 12:04am Sunday, November 18, 2012

NATCHEZ — When ordering a hamburger at a local restaurant this week, customers might get an unusual question — would you like a bun with that?

While much has been made nationally of the immanent loss of the Twinkie due to the closure of Hostess and its associated brands, the ripple effects of that news were felt locally in unexpected ways Friday and Saturday.

As part of the company’s liquidation plan, the Holsum bakery in Alexandria, La., which supplies bread products locally, was shut down with close to no warning Friday. That not only affects local grocery suppliers, but restaurant clients who depended on the bakery’s fresh biweekly deliveries.

The Malt Shop owner Gloria Neames said she received her bread shipment from Holsum Friday morning and was given an invoice, as usual. Not long after, a friend called her and said that they weren’t going to be getting any more shipments. Confused, Neames said she called the Alexandria office to confirm the rumor.

When she found out it was true, Neames decided to head to the Holsum bread store, since she would not be getting her usual Saturday morning shipment of bread.

“I went over to the bread store to at least stock up to get through the weekend, and when I got there they told me they were closing down and that Dairy Queen had beaten me to the punch,” Neames said.

“I got whatever I could get at the bread store. I got hot dog buns and all the hamburger buns they had left.”

The sudden closure of the bakery has left many of the local mom-and-pop restaurants in a sudden lurch to find a new bread supplier, Neames said, and though she made multiple efforts to connect with a regional bakery Friday, she couldn’t get through because the line was busy.

It’s possible local restaurants could run out of buns before the situation is resolved, she said.

“Everybody is in such a panic,” she said. “All we are trying to do is cover ourselves. This is one of our busiest weeks of the year, when all the college kids are in, kids are out of school and people come home for Thanksgiving and they want to get their Malt Shop fix, we are scrambling in the backfield trying to cover ourselves.”

At the Holsum bread store in Natchez, supervisor Joey Bonnette said the seven employees there did not know of the imminent closure until Friday morning, but some deliveries were made anyway. The store was kept open Saturday to clear out the inventory left on the shelves.

“Usually we get a new shipment in the evenings, and we didn’t Thursday,” Bonnette said.

“We weren’t able to service everybody because we didn’t have enough product.”

While they weren’t able to make deliveries to all of their customers Friday, Bonnette said he worked with some of Holsum’s clients to connect them with other product makers in the baking industry. Holsum bread is also produced by Flowers Foods, the makers of Whitewheat and Nature’s Own breads.

In addition to producing Holsum, Hostess Brands makes Wonder Bread, Nature’s Pride, Dolly Madison, Butternut Breads, Drake’s, Eddy’s, Nature’s Pride, Blue Ribbon, Baker’s Inn, Home Pride and other brands. That equals a lot of supermarket shelf space that will suddenly need filling.

“There are probably going to be a couple of days in between that we will be short of product, and it may cause the consumers not to find certain brands they are used to, but there will be products on the shelf,” said Barry Loy, director of operations for The Markets in Natchez, Vidalia and Ferriday.

“There’s probably not going to be a short-term solution to that. All we can hope for is that somewhere down the line another company buys out the Hostess label and starts to produce the products. It is going to leave a big hole in the product lines for a while.”

The Holsum bakery closure in Alexandria also affects The Markets in another way — the store brand Shurfresh bread was produced there. Loy said The Markets were able to arrange for Flowers bakeries to start producing the Shurfresh label bread. That should start arriving Monday morning, Loy said.

Until then, Natchez will have to wait and see if it will have to weather a hamburger bun shortage.

  • Anonymous

    Thousands of lost jobs because of a labor union.

  • Anonymous

    WORTHLESS labor unions. They were a good idea in the beginning, but they have morphed into all-powerful entities. The unions now could not care less about the members- they are out for themselves. Greed, greed, greed.
    And this is just the beginning of Obama’s new day….

  • Anonymous

    This has been brewing for years. Take a look at what the top execs did in the last months…tripled their own salaries. Tell me this wasn’t known to be coming despite anything to do with the unions.

    http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/13/4983174/hostess-continues-pattern-of-misinformation.html#storylink=cpy

  • Anonymous

    Here is a link to the salaries of the involved labor union. Union members= dummies.
    http://www.unionfacts.com/union/Bakery%2C_Confectionary%2C_Tobacco_Workers_%26_Grain_Millers
    God, please help our country.

  • Anonymous

    This “Right To Work” for less BS is what’s bringing our labor force down…..
    I am a union member.and if not for the union, you would be working for slave wages today. the unions brought you 8 hour work days, 40 hour work weeks, the weekends off or work for priemium pay.The unions are for the membership. If you are not a member then YOU dont know anything about the union !!!!! Join Up Or Shut Up!!!! UBC AN PROUD…..

  • Anonymous

    Drink the Kool-Aid, dude. And when the union drives your employer out of business, come back and tell us how THAT worked out.
    And “slave wages” ???? LOL LOL LOL….. oh please!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    You misspelled imminent. Does anyone actually proofread this newspaper?

  • Anonymous

    Bullcrap. You obviously have no idea that labor is commodity. I don’t make the money I do because of any unions. I make the money I do because I possess skills that are in demand and companies compete with wages for my labor. A 5-day work-week is an offshoot of Judeo-Christian tradition and has nothing to do with unions. Never mind the fact that me and millions of other people still work on weekends or more than 8 hours a day.

    I’d dumpster dive for a living before I joined the Democrat’s ground troop thugs. Unions these days are merely leeches trading their votes for blood. Like with Hostess, the blood eventually runs dry.

  • Anonymous

    Unlike most who only have the myopic ability to see where the union is at fault, the greedy corporate “leaders” and the union are BOTH equally responsible, IMO, for bringing this company down. These types will always only side with those in power, as if this gives them some perceived power. I am sure if we were able to look at the salaries of the corporate bosses and not just those of the union workers, we would see ill will on both sides. I know for a fact, unions have their place within a workplace, but when they get “too big” for their britches, ah hem, the BellSouth union, then they are just as responsible for a company’s demise. Hostess, rather than say we would “listen” to and make an effort to REASONABLY meet the worker’s requests, said to customers, not just the workers, that they would rather close up shop, than to reach across the isles. Such a microcosm of what we see today. There’s no REAL compromise unless I get ALL I want. I never really was a big Twinkies eater, but oh how I loved getting a SuzyQ every now and then. Oh well, another era gone up in smoke, and some can only find it to blame the union and not the greedy CEOs.

  • Anonymous

    Only completely rational, capable thinkers get this.

  • Anonymous

    Executives cannot raise their own salaries. I notice that piece is put out be the union. Not surprising. That was part of restructuring planning. What your little union article doesn’t say is that after those “raises” the executives’ compensation was pretty much the same as it always was because they did away with all their bonus and incentive plans. When restructuring financially, that is more desirable and easier for the powers who handle such things to deal with because it is a known and fixed liability whereas incentives and bonuses are not. In later restructuring, the top executive salaries were reduced to $1, to be reinstated Jan 1. had made it out of of this without liquidation.

    The union wasn’t the only thing wrong at Hostess but it definitely was one thing. Hostess was a battered and beleaguered company on the brink of collapse. The strike buried it.

  • Anonymous

    I will say this….if the employers would do right by their employees and the states and feds made sure they did then they would not need unions but these days you work your butt off doing the work of 3 people for one low wage and can’t even make 40 hours at one place so you have to work more than one job just to make ends meet… it causes a domino effect… parents can’t afford to take a day off or they wont make bill and grocery money and that leaves them to have to get friends and family to watch their children, which leads to future problems and the cost of living continues to rise… raising wages only causes the prices to go up with it to cover the wage increase….it is a catch 22 no matter how you look at it… the only possible way for this to ever level out is to stop out sourcing, bring jobs back to America, for the feds to lower and set a sealing price on the cost of goods and services let wages remain as they are and let things balance… the problem is the cost of goods and services have exceeded peoples wages and there are only so many corners and cuts that can be made and still live. Unions were formed to give trades fair rights to pay, working conditions and make employers uphold their end of the bargain… if people weren’t so dishonest these days we would not need unions….used to a hand shake and a mans word were all that was needed and business was done… now you sign your life away and it still aint good enough… there are always pro’s and con’s for everything and I am sure this will not change in the future.

  • Anonymous

    I will say this….if the employers would do right by their employees and the states and feds made sure they did then they would not need unions but these days you work your butt off doing the work of 3 people for one low wage and can’t even make 40 hours at one place so you have to work more than one job just to make ends meet… it causes a domino effect… parents can’t afford to take a day off or they wont make bill and grocery money and that leaves them to have to get friends and family to watch their children, which leads to future problems and the cost of living continues to rise… raising wages only causes the prices to go up with it to cover the wage increase….it is a catch 22 no matter how you look at it… the only possible way for this to ever level out is to stop out sourcing, bring jobs back to America, for the feds to lower and set a sealing price on the cost of goods and services let wages remain as they are and let things balance… the problem is the cost of goods and services have exceeded peoples wages and there are only so many corners and cuts that can be made and still live. Unions were formed to give trades fair rights to pay, working conditions and make employers uphold their end of the bargain… if people weren’t so dishonest these days we would not need unions….used to a hand shake and a mans word were all that was needed and business was done… now you sign your life away and it still aint good enough… there are always pro’s and con’s for everything and I am sure this will not change in the future.

  • Anonymous

    Hostess made a compromise with the teamsters but another smaller union would not go along with it. The teamsters even blasted the smaller union for not compromising with hostess. So yes a union killed these jobs.

  • Anonymous

    Have any one of us taken a look at what the Hostess CEO, CFO and CIOs pulled in for salaries for the last few years? I am well aware that these can’t raise their salaries, but they can refuse them for the good of the company. Again, both sides are to blame and I resent the argument that only the union/workers are to blame.

  • Anonymous

    Craka…My “little article” (Gees must you always try to be such a condescending…..?) This is not a simple story that anybody should try to slot neatly into
    their political talking points. It’s not just about Wall Street preying
    on Main Street, or big bad labor unions sucking a wholesome American
    company dry. It’s about an entire galaxy of bad decisions that will cost
    many people their jobs and money.

  • Anonymous

    Horse puckey!!!

  • Anonymous

    Very good post. Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    had the bcgtm union agreed to the same terms the teamsters agreed to, thousands of people would still be working. That is fact.

  • Khakirat

    Management has been doing the union people bad for years and the union had enough and stood their ground is what been told by both sides!!

  • Anonymous

    Yea, but for how long? What would they have to agree to next time? They gave lots of concessions in the last bankruptcy 3-4 years ago only to see no improvements ( ie.- $2 bln in unfunded pensions) and raises for the Owners (Wall St.) Hostess must have been pretty bad off if shut down was the only option.

  • Anonymous

    Slave wages??? yea, $9-10-an-hour jobs today, that was the normal wage in the mid 1980′s when gas
    was $.60-a-gal and so was a gal of milk or a lb of hamburger, a loaf of bread was ten cents and rent or a house payment was well under $300 a month, how much are each of those things today?
    There hasn’t been a real rise in wages in this country for some 25+ years. Still, everything keeps getting more expensive. The working man is getting squeezed. Not everyone’s looking to make a damned fortune, but you should be able to make at least enough to survive.

  • Anonymous

    Obviously you do Babaloulou, keep up the good work.

  • Anonymous

    “but for how long?”

    Longer than than they have been.

    If these unions know so much and want to make executive decisions and wages, why don’t they risk their capital, put their necks on the line, and go out there and open a business? You wanna know why the executives make the big money? Because they take the risks.

  • Anonymous

    I recall the recent Entergy crews that were not allowed to work in the Northeast after Hurricane Sandy – however, I don’t recall any executives turning them away. Those unions didn’t reach across the aisle, even when they were underwater in a sea of alligators. That is a prime example of unions gone wild.

  • Anonymous

    Wow. While filing for or in bankruptcy. Figures.

  • Anonymous

    Every senior management person in the company could have been paid $0 and it would not have helped. Their salary was reduced to $1 and the company still went under because the union was not willing to give. The problems were in labor (not management) costs, transportation costs and and pensions that could not be funded.

  • Anonymous

    The top executives “profited” from a dying company? No, they did not. A profit is when you sell something for more than it costs you to create it or buy it. The executives of Hostess were paid salaries like everyone else and they are now out of work like everyone else. The investment group who owns Hostess is out millions and millions of dollars. Nobody profited here. That is the real tragedy. The unions saw to that.

  • Anonymous

    Wage and price controls didn’t work when Nixon tried it in 1971 and it won’t work now. Wage and price controls only served to speed inflation and were abandoned in 1974 as a failed policy and bad idea.

    We don’t need unions. Less than 8% of the entire American workforce is unionized. The other 92% of Americans aren’t exactly working in sweat shops for pennies a day, either.

    You are essentially admitting in your post that unions are good for getting people paid more than they are worth. You fail to see that if you are paid $20 an hour, you must produce more than $20 an hour in value to your employer or he will lose money. That is the bottom line and the problem with many unions. They are paid more than they contribute. That causes inflation and it causes companies to go under.

    100 years ago unions served a real purpose. Now they are just parasites trying to get all they can regardless who they screw in the process. management tries to keep the company profitable and unions try to take that profit for themselves, even when there is no profit.

Editor's Picks

composer