Breaking News

Jefferson County inmate at large

City to restart trash contract process

Published 12:09am Friday, February 1, 2013

NATCHEZ — An Adams County circuit court judge ruled Thursday that the City of Natchez must restart its bidding process to select companies for waste collection and disposal services.

The ruling comes after Waste Management appealed the Natchez Board of Aldermen’s decision in late November to award the city collection contract to Waste Pro USA and disposal contract to Riverbend Environmental Services.

The board decided during a specially called meeting to contract with Waste Pro USA for waste collection services and Riverbend Environmental Services for disposal for a combined yearly rate of $785,250.

Waste Management presented the city with a combined collection and disposal contract for $764,730.

The aldermen voted 4-2 for the contract with Waste Pro, with Ward 3 Alderwoman Sarah Smith and Ward 5 Alderman Mark Fortenbery saying they believed the city should take the lower price.

Mayor Butch Brown broke a 3-3 tie voting for the contract with Riverbend. He has said he believes the potential for growth at the landfill in Jefferson County will allow the city to get tonnage rebates.

In the court order, Judge Forrest “Al” Johnson said the city based its decision on factors other than price. That was a clear violation of statute, he said, because the request for proposals did not include that other factors would be considered.

Johnson points out in the order that statute 31-7-13 allows the city to negotiate with the most qualified proposals “on the basis of price, technology and other relevant factors” in an effort to obtain a better price. The statute also says, Johnson noted, that all factors determined relevant by a governing authority “shall be included in the advertisement to elicit proposals.”

“The request for proposals sought by the City of Natchez … was limited to a decision based on rates,” Johnson said in the order.

Even though Waste Management, Waste Pro and Riverbend had actual notice of “other relevant factors” by private letter, the notice failed to satisfy the statutory requirements, Johnson said in the order.

Waste Pro will continue to provide collection services and Waste Management disposal services until new contracts are awarded, Johnson said in the ruling.

The city will select a new request for proposal and will not be bound by the previous request, Johnson said. The new contracts shall be awarded no later than the expiration of Waste Management’s current disposal contract in June.

Buford Clark, manager of public sector solutions for the Waste Management Gulf Coast Area, said in a press release Waste Management agrees with the court’s decision.

“Waste Management has served as a proud partner with the City of Natchez for more than 25 years,” Clark said.

“We stand behind the work we do in the community, and we will be aggressive participants in the new RFP review process.”

Brown said the ruling is actually somewhat good news.

“I’m encouraged now that everybody knows what the others’ prices are, and we’ll probably get a lower price,” Brown said. “We will be extra careful so that Waste Management feels like they have not been slighted.

“Unfortunately, the taxpayers of Natchez have been slighted (by Waste Management) for the last 20 years,” Brown said.

City Attorney Hyde Carby said that while he does not necessarily agree with the court’s finding that the city violated the law, the restarting of the selection process should be favorable to the city.

“We saw significant savings in the first round, and we’ll see even more savings now because of the competitive pressure,” he said.

Waste Pro and Riverbend representatives could not be reached for comment.

  • Anonymous

    DUUUuuuuhhhhhh!!!!! Ole “Glory Days” Brown and the others should have KNOWN not to go this route. Where was the legal counsel?

  • Anonymous

    “decision in late November 2011″

    You mean 2012?

  • Anonymous

    You are correct, bellesouth1. They made a mistake with the date.

  • http://www.natchezdemocrat.com khakirat

    Sound like B.Brown isn’t above the law huh’??!! Can’t wait to hear whats going to happen!! Hope the county does it right by state law?!

  • Anonymous

    The glory days don’t seem to be that glorious this time around.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1407062764 Joe Smith

    so i am guessing brown is taking credit for getting a possible better price because he voted for a higher price because he knew the loser would file and win an appeal !! boy that BB is some kinda smart,, idnt he!! don’t we all feel lucky

  • Anonymous

    How can waste management explain lowering their price by 30%. After 20 yrs being the same price , but to business owners around town raising their dumpster rates. 40% In a matter of 6 months, and then only allowing you out of your contract if you pay 6 months rent and a $500 pickup fee. Waste Management is not your friend People.!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Waste mgt was charging me 164 for my dumpster. Waste pro offered same size for 78. Read waste mgt contract and to get out of contract you had to notify in writing between the 120 and 90 day window before contract expires or it auto renews. My contract was original signed for 128 dollars but I was now paying 164 due to they had right to raise for “hazardous enviromental fees” is what I was told. In the end I got out of contract due to luckily I was in that window of oppurtunity. Their sales team called 1 month later and offered contract for 86 a month. Almost half original charge. I have heard other business owners complaining also. Business owners pull your contract and read it before you get “auto renewed” also.

  • Anonymous

    Continued good ole boys deals behind closed doors. The casino is another example. Check the “crowds.”

  • Anonymous

    I’m for Waste Management. They have the experience, and that to me, makes up for the (higher) cost.

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like once again Lucy picked up the ball when Brown tried to kick it.

  • Anonymous

    Somehow, I don’t think the Mayor ought to be going around casting accusations about a company without backing them up? And how would he know? He lives in the county. And who does the county’s trash. Check out the back story: http://www.natchezdemocrat.com/2012/11/10/county-city-split-on-trash-contract/

  • Anonymous

    It seems to me I was at an alderman meeting a while back where the Waste Management presented the city with a check, possibly with being partners with city thing?

  • Anonymous

    He was out getting his diaper changed. I believe this is just the beginning of setbacks the city administration has ahead of them, including living outside the city as the least, Arlington drilling, casino revenue sharing, fire fighting, police inadequacy in crime fighting, and crumbling infrastructure of all the empty buildings they own or lease for a few pennies with taxpayer dollars going to maintain them while they squander new revenues from casinos, oil wells, etc. I’m glad they don’t own the cash cow called Natchez Regional – it would have been sold for a song long ago rather than market value. Throw in a boat anchor like a new rec. complex and just go fishing!

  • Anonymous

    Yeah well, some things have to change. Broken glass spilled in the middle of the street for two weeks in a row. Trash spilled in the middle of the street in multiple places. Damaged garbage cans.
    I did NOT have these issues with the Waste Management crews.

Editor's Picks