Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 9 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

photo by Destiney Robb

Justice Court Judge Charlie Vess tries to calm down Eva Dunkley after an altercation broke out after Election Commission Chairman Larry Gardner announced a computer malfunction during the vote counting process Tuesday.

Malfunction postpones vote certification

Published Wednesday, August 15, 2007

NATCHEZ — A week of ballot counting and waiting ended in a shouting match in the courthouse halls and a call to the sheriff’s department Tuesday evening.

Computer problems — or, more specifically, a memory card malfunction — meant the machine could not tally the final ballot counts Tuesday night.

Audrey Seale listens as Beverly Merrill reacts to news that ballot totals would not be completed today. Tension rose as computer problems hindered Tuesday'€™s efforts at the Adams County Courthouse.

Photo by Destiney Robb

Audrey Seale listens as Beverly Merrill reacts to news that ballot totals would not be completed today. Tension rose as computer problems hindered Tuesday'€™s efforts at the Adams County Courthouse.

After the Democratic committee hand-counted all ballots that needed it, absentee, affidavit and emergency ballots were scanned into a machine. The machine then put the information on a memory card.

But when the election commission put the memory card into a machine that would add all the ballot types, the card looked blank.

When the situation was announced, tensions boiled over. Democratic Executive Committee member Beverly Merrill and Natchez resident Eva Dunkley started shouting at each other, exchanging insults.

Prior to that, justice court candidate Patricia Dunmore asked if more could be done Tuesday night.

“We’ve been trying to get this done for a week,” Dunmore asked. “Have you considered counting these by hand?”

Democratic Executive Committee Vice President Audrey Seale said that was not an option Tuesday night.

“What we have already done is but a fraction of those (800 absentee ballots),” Seale said. “I am not about to count those. I am going home.”

Some candidates were concerned about where the ballots would be stored, but it was determined they should be kept locked in the holding cell on the second floor.

Election Commission Chairman Larry Gardner announces a computer malfunction during the vote counting process Tuesday.

Photo by Destiney Robb

Election Commission Chairman Larry Gardner announces a computer malfunction during the vote counting process Tuesday.

The Democratic Party finished counting and verifying affidavit and absentee ballots Tuesday. The only step left was to add those and combine them with Election Day results.

The computer wouldn’t read a memory card on which scanned ballot data was stored, Election Commission Chairman Larry Gardner said.

“(The machine) was communicating with the card and then it stopped,” Gardner said.

A similar memory card problem arose when the voting machines were put through a test-run before the election, Gardner said.

“We couldn’t get (one memory card) to test,” Gardner said. “We felt it was probably a bad card, replaced it with another, and the new one passed.”

Technicians will be called out and, with any luck, they will have results today.

“It won’t take any time once we get a memory card that works,” Gardner said.

In the noise Tuesday, Justice Court Judge Charlie Vess called the sheriff’s department, and the crowd dispersed.

“I am a warden of the peace,” Vess said. “We’re all a little stressed out.”

A candidate perched on the possibility of a runoff, Vess said the delay meant another day he didn’t know whether or not to campaign.

“I’m sitting on ordering 5,000 campaign cards,” Vess said. “I’m within a half-point of not having a runoff, and it makes it a little more stressful.”

District 3 supervisor incumbent Thomas “Boo” Campbell, who also faces the possibility of a runoff, was at the courthouse Tuesday.

“I basically have mellowed out,” Campbell said. “I was pretty upset earlier, but I’ve mellowed out. Whenever they’re through, they’re through.”

Campbell said he had prepared mentally but not physically for a runoff.

Campbell said he understood about computer problems.

“Those things happen,” he said. “Often, computers break down when you’re in a crunch.”

Ben Hillyer contributed to this article.

Comments

Posted by Incognito (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 7:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

In the name of Jesus.

Posted by Crazynms (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Just go back to the old fashion way. Or just do ALL paper ballots.

Posted by ratherbefishin (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

We all need to worry about these touch screen computers.

Posted by Bozo (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 10:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

How can they have only done a fraction of the 800 absentee ballots in a week????? If you do one ballot a minute, take a 10 minute break an hour, thats 50 ballots an hour, 400 ballots in an 8 hour day. That's a very leisurely pace, it should take no more than 2 days. It ain't that complicated. On another subject, George Dunkley is one of the most easy going guys you would ever want to meet, how did he end up with screech and scream Eva??? I guess opposites do attract.

Posted by whatitis (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 1:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You have to watch Evil I mean Eva. And what is she doing there anyway? Notice that everyone she campaigns for loses. Candidates if you want to have a chance in office, do not let that woman handle your campaign!!!!

Posted by mommyof3 (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 2:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Just another wasted day with another wasted dollar. Why can't people leave well enough alone. If counting votes is that difficult go back to pen and paper and be done with it. Remember "if it ain't brone, don't fix it"!!!!!

Posted by Idefinitelymight (Tom Scarborough) on August 15, 2007 at 2:59 p.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Posted by seeemeeego (anonymous) on August 15, 2007 at 7:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What about the progress of counties of similar size - have those counties finished certifying their election results? This does seem like an inordinately long process.

Posted by msblackstallion (anonymous) on March 16, 2008 at 5:10 p.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



advanced search

© 2008, Natchez Newspapers, Inc.

Contact us