Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 8 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Planning discusses code, riverfront building heights
Published Tuesday, October 16, 2007
NATCHEZ — The Natchez Planning Commission is considering limiting the height of riverfront construction to what it used to be.
In 2005 the board of aldermen voted to change the existing ordinance, raising the limitation to 75 feet. Previously, the city code restricted building height along the bluff to no taller than the tallest existing building in the surrounding area.
The changes came when the city was recruiting the bluff condo development and the convention center hotel.
At an informal work session Monday, former city attorney Walter Brown reviewed changes to the code and accepted suggestions for further change.
As it was originally written, the code would have allowed the planning commission to only make recommendations regarding site plans and other planning matters. All final decisions would have had to be made by the board of aldermen.
“That puts the board of aldermen at the end of every process, and the meetings would be even longer than they are now,” Brown said, addressing the commission.
After discussing it with both the aldermen and the planning commission, Brown said all were in favor of changing the proposed code to keep those procedures the way they currently are. The commission would make decisions, and anyone could appeal those decisions to the aldermen.
Another change to the proposed code was the prohibition of reader board signs, or those that are lighted and scroll words.
The current city code does not address the topic, Brown said. City policy prohibits the signs, but the board of aldermen has granted variances in the past.
The proposed code originally did not address the signs, but the change prohibits them.
The planning commission will meet Thursday and will likely vote on the changes. The code will then go before the board and a public hearing at their Nov. 13 meeting.
“Whether they’re going to vote on it on the 13th or in December, I don’t know, but we need to get this thing adopted,” Brown said.
Commission Chair Deborah Martin wondered if the commission would be informed if the aldermen made changes to the proposed code.
“Are they making changes to these changes?” Martin said. “They may want to change it. Are they going to tell us?”
Brown said the board might let them know, but it would be a good idea, if they wanted their voices heard, to attend the aldermen’s public hearing.
The proposed code combines various city ordinances, such as those addressing telecommunications, bed and breakfasts and sign regulations, into one code.





Comments
Posted by NtzMom55 (anonymous) on October 16, 2007 at 12:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think they need to make changes on the changes to allow changes to be made on the changes.
i i i s..stuuddderr...tyyype.
Posted by Hunter (anonymous) on October 16, 2007 at 3:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I just hope they don't allow too much height to new buildings.
Eola used to have "riverview" rooms, but now I think they just call them "riverside."
Posted by thelorax (anonymous) on October 16, 2007 at 8:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think the new hotel by the Convention Center is an eyesore. You cannot tell you are by the river when you are uptown for the fact of that HUGE building that blocks everything.
The City of Natchez should have allowed such a HUGE building right by the river.
Posted by natchez1 (anonymous) on October 16, 2007 at 10:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The new hotel is only a few feet taller than the penthouse part of the Callon building. It is still unfinished but when you look at Natchez as you come across the Bridge it does not look out of scale, or even particularly noticeable. Yes it is a big building but it will be an asset to Natchez and I think when finished most people will be impressed. It took a while for people to get used to the convention center, when finished and landscaped the hotel will not appear as large.
Posted by Tris (anonymous) on October 16, 2007 at 5:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sounds to me like a bunch of double talk. When it comes right down to it they will do as they please as long as someone has the right amount to grease the right palms. Money talks in this town and rules mean nothing. In my opinion the Convention Hotel is UGLY and the Hampton is even worse.
Posted by ntzmom (anonymous) on October 16, 2007 at 10:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
yeah, the downtown hotel is ugly...so far any way.
Posted by thedude (anonymous) on October 17, 2007 at 3:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I just like the name of it "THE COUNTRY INN", soundes like a truck stop hotel
Posted by brod (anonymous) on October 17, 2007 at 6:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Codes, codes, and more codes. Meetings to discuss other meetings. Discussing changes to the changes. There's something smelly here. Did we elect our Board of Aldermen to do this? Is their participation in this sort of rig-a-ma-roll what their getting paid for? I guess we, Joe Q. Public, could start meeting to discuss the meeting and make changes to the changes. This is such a bucket of hoo-ey. The above article basically said that they met and did nothing.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)