Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 10 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
photo by Steve VanGunda
Aldermen Tony Fields, along with Tourism and Marketing advisory council member Janice Guido, listen to Alderwoman Joyce Arceneaux-Mathis speak during Tuesday night’s finance meeting at Natchez City Council building.
Natchez marketing budget approved by aldermen
Published Wednesday, August 27, 2008
NATCHEZ — The marketing budget created for the $2 occupancy tax has been approved by the board of aldermen and will take effect Sept 1.
Janice Guido, marketing advisory committee liaison to the Natchez Convention and Visitors Bureau board, gave an overview of the budget during the board’s finance meeting.
She said the committee has several goals it wants to reach through the new money.
“Our goal is to increase (tourism) by a minimum of 3 percent,” Guido said.
Another goal is to beef up traffic at the convention center.
“In my humble estimate, you’re probably at 50 percent potential,” she said.
With so much room to grow and with conventions impacting every aspect of Natchez, she said that’s a good focus to have.
“That business flows into everything we do,” Guido said.
Other plans for the $480,000 estimated accrual total include revamping the city’s Web site to bring in more leisure tourists.
Members of the board were leery of fluctuating hotel occupancy rates that could affect that $480,000 estimate.
Guido said they played conservatively when they came up with the number, and Director of Tourism Connie Taunton assured the board that the marketing committee will meet quarterly to review the budget.
Alderwoman Joyce Arceneaux-Mathis requested that if any tweaking is done to the budget through these quarterly meetings that they be presented to the board.
Guido agreed to that.
In other business during Tuesday’s board of aldermen meeting, the Rev. Leon Howard, chairman of the negotiating committee of the Natchez branch of the NAACP, brought up an issue he wanted the board to evaluate.
George Davis owns and operates a fruit stand behind the Walgreens on D’Evereux Drive.
According to Davis, he wanted to move the fruit stand within the 300 block of the street.
However, zoning ordinances have changed and in order to move his stand, he would have to get permission from the planning department.
According to Howard, after having plans revised and redrawn twice, City Planner John “Rusty” Lewis denied permission.
Howard said Lewis “refused to let him stay open” and told Davis to leave the city.
“That’s (un)lawful and distasteful,” Howard said. “We deserve, we ask for and yet we demand to be treated fairly.”
Howard also argued that even if the code did change, it took effect after the stand was in place, and Davis should be grandfathered in.



Comments
Posted by lookingout (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 5:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
oh my.....
Posted by StuWhoMoved (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 6:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I bet George Davis would get a lot better results if he would have had somebody other than Leon Howard arguing his point. The man just mkaes things worse!
Posted by Bigfish (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hopefully tourism will grow by 3%, its good to know that this new tourism board is at least setting some type of goal, instead of just spending without regard to results.
The city planner is a deadbeat, telling people to leave town. I say out with the city planner and get someone that would work to keep a (fruitstand, businesses, hotels, etc) in town and open.
Posted by SayItRight (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 9:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And the reason for moving was? Also, let's hear why he was denied, not just that a man wanted something and didn't get his way. If they let him draw up plans there must have been a chance that they were going to let him move, if not they should have told him up front.
Posted by andy (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 10:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
they donot call davis peter rabbit for nothing he is way ahead of this board he will win
Posted by gemccull (Gary McCullars) on August 27, 2008 at 11:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It seems that it is the same old, same old!
Where is the over sight from the Marketing Advisory Committee and the Board of Aldermen? One would think that a detailed marketing plan would be in place before a budget would be approved. Otherwise, it is business as usual for the NCVB.
Posted by jack (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 1:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
yes look like the same in natchez garden club runs city gov. policemen will loose again and board and mayor will do nothing
Posted by redusmfan (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 6:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I wonder what they are going to do with all $500 that they will get every month or 2....lol..
Just kidding around folks. Have a great evening.
Posted by gemccull (Gary McCullars) on August 27, 2008 at 7:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As previously reported in the paper, if the budget is $480,000 (now approved by the BOA) and $206,400 was allocated toward leisure and $193,600 was allocated toward conventions, what about the other $80,000?
Or has there been a different allocation from the previous reporting and the approval by the BOA?
Posted by sammohon (anonymous) on August 27, 2008 at 10:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm with you Gary...I was in favor of the tax, but the numbers have to add up without accessory smoke and mirrors and they have to be reasonably allocated, publically!
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)