Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 12 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Cigarette tax fight not totally snuffed
Published Monday, February 11, 2008
JACKSON (AP) — Lawmakers who travel High Street to reach the Mississippi Capitol get a daily reminder about an issue that hasn’t gone away despite the efforts of Gov. Haley Barbour.
A billboard with the image of smiling children on one side and a pack of Marlboro cigarettes on the other asks the question: ‘‘Whose side are you on: Big Tobacco or Mississippi’s children?’’
The stark, black-and-white backdrop of the billboard is an apt depiction of a tax swap proposal that gained momentum in 2006 before fizzling under Barbour’s veto. The bill would have raised the 18-cents-a-pack excise tax on cigarettes and cut the state’s 7 percent grocery tax.
An attempt to pass a similar bill last year was killed by one of Barbour’s allies who chaired a Senate committee.
Many lawmakers say the reason they’ll continue to push for passage is simple: Mississippi has one of the highest grocery tax rates in the nation, and one of the lowest excise taxes on cigarettes.
‘‘Primarily, I think we’re going to be looking at some kind of way to increase it and earmark it for Medicaid or the state’s trauma system,’’ said House Ways and Means Chairman Percy Watson, D-Hattiesburg.
‘‘We have a statutory constitutional duty to do what we feel is in the best interest of the state,’’ said Watson, referring to the need to generate revenue at time when some state agencies are facing multimillion dollar deficits.
There are at least five tobacco tax bills referred to Watson’s committee. Sixteen states allocate some cigarette tax revenues to health programs, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Tobacco taxes have been raised in 12 states over the last year, the campaign said.
Barbour, a Republican, just started his second term as governor. He is a former Washington lobbyist whose clients included some tobacco companies. He says repeatedly that he is opposed to raising taxes.
The governor has proposed other ways to plug budget holes, including streamlining government agencies and imposing what he calls an assessment on hospitals; critics say the assessment is simply a tax.
Lt. Gov. Phil Bryant, a fellow Republican, presides over the Senate where a roadblock is waiting for any tobacco tax bills.
The Coalition of Communities for a Clean Bill of Health, the group that sponsored the billboard, has conducted research that shows a $1 tax on a pack of cigarettes would generate $150 million annually. The group gave lawmakers copies of the survey last week.
The coalition has gained an ally in the Mississippi Hospital Association, which is more vocal in its support of a cigarette tax this year. MHA sees a tobacco tax a a better option than taxing the state’s public and private hospitals.
Barbour wants to levy a 1.5 percent tax on the gross revenue of hospitals to shore up the budget of Medicaid, a health care program that receives both state and federal dollars.
The program, which serves 568,000 of the state’s poor, elderly and disabled, faces a $92 million budget shortfall the fiscal year that ends June 30. Medicaid is asking for at least $268 million in extra funding for the year that starts July 1.
‘‘We do not think that hospital patients should be taxed to pay for a state-federal program,’’ said MHA president and CEO Sam Cameron. ‘‘We believe the state should put a $1 tax on tobacco because a lot of the health-related issues come from tobacco.’’
The Legislature would have to approve Barbour’s hospital tax proposal.
In 2006, Barbour imposed a tax on hospitals to generate $45 million to cover a shortfall in Medicaid. The association sued, questioning whether Barbour had a constitutional right to levy the tax. The governor withdrew the tax, saying federal funding for Hurricane Katrina recovery would cover the Medicaid hole.
Cameron said the association wouldn’t file another lawsuit over the tax. He said MHA was working with lawmakers to ‘‘explore other funding options’’ for Medicaid.
Bryant said it’s ‘‘very unlikely’’ a cigarette tax would make it out of the Senate until a commission appointed by Barbour completes a study of the state’s tax structure in August.
‘‘What our proposal is now is to balance our budget. To use the revenue we have now to fully fund our Medicaid costs and to be reasonable in our expenditures,’’ Bryant said.
Bryant supports Barbour’s plan to exempt several agencies from the oversight of the state Personnel Board, which provides job protection to state employees.
Barbour has said the Department of Corrections and the state Agriculture Department reduced agency spending after the oversight was remove since it allows directors to hire and fire at will.
‘‘We’re talking about ’right-sizing’ state government,’’ Bryant said, borrowing a phrase from Barbour.
————
The bills are House Bills 20, 22, 73, 209, and 371.





Comments
Posted by kpage (anonymous) on February 11, 2008 at 9:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I smoke, but I'd rather pay an extra tax on those cigarettes to get tax-free groceries for everyone in the state. It's so simple, yet Barbour is siding with Big Tobacco. He's taking care of a few to spite the whole state! What a dog.
Posted by EnKiKur (anonymous) on February 11, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This tax this- tax that process is just too slow and inefficient. We should go to a 100% federal income tax, with our pay going directly to the Central Planning Office. Then our money could be used in the best possible way and everything would be free for everybody.
Posted by Username (anonymous) on February 11, 2008 at 11:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Great I'll buy my smokes in La and get my groceries in Ms and take advantage of that loophole.
Posted by Krogers (anonymous) on February 11, 2008 at 11:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I hope you're being sarcastic Enkikur.
I don't smoke, so they can tax that all they want, far as I care. If you want to hurt Big Tobacco, quit smoking.
Low grocery tax would be nice.
It's really sad that so many people are so easily controlled, and are slowly killing themselves.
Posted by damifino (Gale Coleman) on February 11, 2008 at 12:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
He IS being sarcastic, Kroger. Read The ChurchHill Republican....GREAT writer!
Posted by rushinghjr (anonymous) on February 11, 2008 at 3:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Watch them Krogers! There "loose" again! Where is Church Hill?
Posted by damifino (Gale Coleman) on February 11, 2008 at 8:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The ChurchHill Republican is an online website and is not actually a newspaper. He writes "tongue in cheek" so to speak. Go to the humor section and start at the bottom, working your way up. His characters are fictional based on real people. Fascinating reading at the least.
Posted by rushinghjr (anonymous) on February 11, 2008 at 8:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
(Damifino) Thanks for the info! I was "poking" at Krogers about Church Hill!
Posted by fire39212 (anonymous) on February 13, 2008 at 12:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't understand how Cigarettes is still on the market...If it was a pill they would pull them off the market FASTTTT....But, yet it's Cigarettes killing us slowly. They still on the market. Yes i smoke. If they weren't on the market then i wouldn't. Would have no choice but, to quit.
Posted by Peace007 (anonymous) on February 14, 2008 at 10:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So is ChurchHill Republican named for the town or the man?
Posted by unc (anonymous) on February 15, 2008 at 12:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Definitely the city, Peace
Posted by guy2co (anonymous) on February 17, 2008 at 12:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Has anyone noticed that the state govt. says they need to raise taxes on cigarettes and at the same time they are giving themselves a raise. I think they should leave our taxes alone. We pay too much as it is. I don't want them to use my taxes to give themselves a raise every time they want to.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)