Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 9 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Cronkite wasn't the only 'anchor'

Published Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Just a few thoughts about Democrat Publisher Kevin Cooper’s column about Walter Cronkite, CBS’s great anchorman who died last week.

But a confession first: nearly all my working life was spent at NBC stations and for 14 years NBC itself.

But I have no quarrel with Kevin’s glowing tribute to Cronkite. I do, however, question his statement that Cronkite was “the first TV news personality to be dubbed as the news anchor.”

Maybe so, maybe not.

The term “anchor” is now part of the language, meaning not only that which holds a boat or ship in place but also describes the main news reader on a TV newscast.

Until the last half of the 1950s or early ’60s, the main man (not a single woman anchor in those years) who read the news was known simply as the news announcer or news reader.

It is my recollection that, contrary to what Kevin and others are now saying, the term “anchor” was coined by a man named Reuven Frank, a top news executive with NBC in the period we’re talking about. It was Frank who first teamed a couple of guys named Chet Huntley and David Brinkley and made them household names in the late 1950s and the entire decade of the 1960s. And it was Frank who invented their famous signoff: “Good night David. Good night Chet.” The two were in separate cities — Brinkley in Washington, Huntley  broadcasting from New York. And it was Frank, as best I can remember, who first came up with the term “anchor” to describe what Huntley and Brinkley were — the principle news readers of a newscast.

Kevin also left a clear impression that Walter Cronkite dominated the national news scene during his years at CBS.

For part of that period, he did, but for much of his tenure he did not. Huntley and Brinkley became the principal anchors at NBC in 1956 after they were successfully teamed during the 1956 convention.

They quickly caught on and captured the lead from CBS (at that time Douglas Edwards was CBS anchor)

Cronkite  took over from Edwards in 1962 and remained principal anchor at CBS until he retired in 1981.

But Huntley-Brinkley led the news ratings for the entire decade of the 1960s which saw some of the biggest stories in American history: the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, the tumultuous racial integration period, the Vietnam war and the moon landing. Cronkite was great but Huntley and Brinkley had the most viewers.

Huntley retired in 1970 and it was the decade of the 1970s when Cronkite took the lead and became, as Kevin Cooper said, “TV news anchor for a generation.”

Well, half a generation certainly. Sad to say, all three anchors are now dead.

Bill Slatter

Natchez resident

Comments

Posted by jlmorris (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 1:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

“Good night David. Good night Chet.”

If I am not mistaken the sign off had more words. "Good night David. Good night Chet and good night to Gulf"

Gulf Oil was the sponsor in those days.

Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Chet and David both got the respect they deserved when they died so why is it you want to short Walter the respect he deserves?

Posted by Yeahuhuh (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 9:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I think what impressed me most about Cronkite was his statement that many of the precious freedoms we enjoy would -- in his opinion -- be totally thrown out as soon as the USA was threatened by attacks such as the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

Then such an attack came along and we got incredible press for torture, incarceration without trial, a war started on erroneous pretense, and an imperial presidency and vice presidency that seemed to follow Cronkite's prediction exactly.

I did always find him easy to believe, though he, too, never told the whole story.

Now that we have a news system that sells whatever details it can get hold of we call it liberal bias and prefer to think we know more than the news professionals do.

Cronkite kept it simple and didn't challenge us much about our own warts -- that made him popular, too.

Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What made Huntley, Brinkley and Cronkite so memorable are the news people that followed them were more actors than newsmen. Of course broadcasting in black and white does add a bit of drama to a dull news day.

Posted by ntzfred (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 9:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Actually it looks like Cronkite took the lead in ratings in 1967.

Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 10:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Just guessing here but one reason NBC might have won the ratings is because they were the first network to broadcast in color.

Posted by barbarj1 (anonymous) on July 22, 2009 at 1:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Like beammeupscotty said they all were good; now let Cronkite have his day. They had theirs. May they all rest in peace.

Posted by rushinghjr (anonymous) on July 23, 2009 at 12:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes, another Liberal passes!

Posted by Yeahuhuh (anonymous) on July 23, 2009 at 3:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Just like to Ossama, almost everybody else looks like liberal wimps, so, too, to rushingjr does everybody in the mainstream look liberal.

Wonder if he is proud to share that distinction with a fellow extreme conservative from the opposite side of the fence?

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



advanced search

Try these other Natchez Newspaper Web sites: Natchez on the River and Natchez Scene

© 2010, Natchez Newspapers, Inc.

Contact us | Privacy Policy