Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 4 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Let the public speak
Published Sunday, November 8, 2009
Regis Philbin and the makers of “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” first introduced the “Ask the Audience” lifeline.
Stumped contestants could simply see what the majority of the audience thought the answer to a trivia question was. And, more often than not, the audience was correct.
“Ask the Audience” may have been a novel concept when the TV game show debuted in 1999, but a real-world example just hit our community last week.
Tuesday’s stunning election results in Adams County reenergized me with proof that the people can govern — even if we had to use a lifeline.
For years we’ve looked to the elected officials for all the vision and leadership. Unfortunately in some cases there’s little of either.
Many of the people we elect seem to just become local celebrities of a sort and in the process lose their connection to getting things done. Perhaps voters simply re-elect them because of their familiar names or pretty faces.
Regardless, the nearly eight out of 10 residents who voted to support pursuing a community-wide recreation project have given me a new, radical idea for moving our community ahead.
While the local politicians and their difficult to follow agendas often seem stuck in indecisiveness, the masses seem resolute on what needs to get done.
After decades of talking and talking and talking about recreation, it just took one simple action to gain clarity — ask the voters.
And the voters certainly spoke — screamed you might say. Voters sent the message to elected officials, a crystal clear mandate: We want improved recreation facilities.
Recreation improvements could be a community-changer, but only if we approach the issue wisely and using the power of the people to propel good fiscally sound ideas to happen.
Renewed faith in the masses could be a revolutionary way to govern.
Every two years, the county should hold a special election in which we ask the voters: “Which of the following local issues should our community tackle within the next four years?”
Then simply list all of the items that are currently being discussed. Top three vote getters get put on the front burner.
While it might seem wasteful — special elections are certainly not cheap — think of the hundreds of thousands of dollars we’d save by not starting and stopping projects or by never having to pay another $100,000 for a “feasibility study.”
Trusting government is difficult sometimes, but faced with putting the future in the hands of government or in the hands of the masses, I’d almost always go for the latter.
Imagine how quickly and clearly we could get to the bottom of such questions as:
Should Natchez and Adams County consider consolidating into one government entity, thereby shrinking the overall size — and cost — of local government?
Do we need to pursue building new public school buildings?
Should the city and county partner together — more than they already do — to provide better countywide fire protection?
Should Natchez seek out a second or third casino development?
Maybe that’s a pie-in-the-sky approach to having the people drive their own government. But maybe, just maybe, it might be a way to get the things done which the majority of people find important.
Add a nattily dressed Philbin, dramatic lighting and music and we’ll have ourselves one heck of a community showstopper.
Kevin Cooper is publisher of The Natchez Democrat. He can be reached at 601-445-3539 or kevin.cooper@natchezdemocrat.com.





Comments
Posted by OldGrandDad (anonymous) on November 8, 2009 at 7:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Kevin, I don't necessarily disagree with your suggestion, but I think the same thing could be accomplished if our local politicians would simply run on a "platform" of issues. That way our elected officals would be responsible for following through on the ideas that brought them into office. An example would be to have people run for aldermen who promised to reduce the alderman salaries to $6000 per year. Once elected, the ball would be in their court to accomplish what they had promised.
Of course, this would require stringent oversight by our local media. And good-ole-boy popularity contest style campaigns would have to be laughed out of the county by the good citizens.
Posted by eawprops (anonymous) on November 9, 2009 at 3:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The current mayor, which I voted for, is a do nothing local celebrity. You speak to the man and get no results.
Similar to the situation with the ND. Local news media is responsible for pointing out problems with local government and when they can't they become complicit.
I'm so glad a new radical idea came to you. My radical idea is reporting on government failures and then asking for results!
Posted by steve_o (anonymous) on November 9, 2009 at 5:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
" My radical idea is reporting on government failures and then asking for results!"
Eawprops, sorry for hooking on. But I stumbled across this earlier.
http://www.recovery.gov/transparency/pag...
This may be old news to some, but how does an apartment complex qualify for a half a million dollars for rental assistance?
Seems there is $18,000,000 allocated for Adams County for almost 20 jobs! (19.85 to be exact)
Source: http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx
Posted by eawprops (anonymous) on November 10, 2009 at 9:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
steve_o no problem, help yourself
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)