Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 13 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Adams County spends more than budgeted
Published Saturday, November 14, 2009
NATCHEZ — Adams County spent $2.1 million more in the 2008-2009 fiscal year than it had budgeted.
The original budget approved by Sept. 15, 2008, included $27,432,773 in expenditures.
“What we base our initial budget on is what we do in the prior year,” County Administrator Cathy Walker said.
“It’s hard to predict. We just have to take an estimate of what our cost wound up being over the last few years,” she said.
Walker said a number of factors can influence the budget including unplanned projects and natural disasters.
The county over-stepped its budget in the areas of public works, health and welfare, conservation of natural resources, economic development and assistance and other financing uses.
In 2008-2009, public works projects overtaxed its $5,341,826 beginning budget by providing funding for EWP conservation projects, roadwork on Government Fleet and Morgantown roads and Hurricane Gustav cleanup efforts.
Public works finished the fiscal year spending $7,070,307.
“That was $1 million that we didn’t budget for,” Walker said.
The county’s health and welfare expenditures fluctuate from year-to-year depending on healthcare costs and employee health, Walker said.
“We are self-funded as far as insurance, and we always have to guess based on how many employees we have as to how much money we’re going to have to pay out,” Walker said.
Initially, the county set aside $1,418,063 for its ’08-’09 budget, but the amended budget shows $2,285,921 being spent in health and welfare costs.
“This year, it was $885,000 more than what we estimated that we’d have to pay out,” Walker said.
In the areas of conservation of natural resources and economic development and assistance, the county went over budget by approximately $180,000.
Walker said conservation funding went toward other EWP projects such as stopping erosion at houses and working on other soil projects.
“They are doing some stabilization on the banks of St. Catherine Creek,” Walker said.
Walker said the board agreed to help with the project in early 2009.
The stipulations of the agreement stated the county would help with maintaining the creek if rainfall exceeded approximately four inches during a storm.
Walker said the probability of receiving more than four inches of rain was slim to none at the time of the agreement but within a month, the rain came and the bottom dropped out of the budgeted line.
More than $1 million was spent on other financing uses.
This includes the county’s purchase of a crane for the Natchez-Adams County Port, other machinery or vehicles approved for county departments and roadwork.
Walker said while it’s not unusual for a county’s budget to be off by approximately $1 million, $2 million in overspending is a bit more than normal.
“This year, I think there were just several big projects that were taken on that caused us to be that much different,” Walker said.
Supervisor Darryl Grennell said the he believed the reason the county overspent its budget was a matter of not supplying the budget with enough cushioning for last-minute projects and disaster relief.
“This is the first time since I’ve been in office that we’ve gone over budget by $2 million,” Grennell said.
“Normally, for the many years we’ve always had significant end-of-the-year cash balances to carry over into the next year.
“But when you adopt a bare-boned budget, it causes this type of scenario,” Grennell said.
Attempts to reach board president Henry Watts for comment were unsuccessful.





Comments
Posted by stateofnatchez (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 12:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Yes we can" ....spend as much money as we want !!!
and "yes we can"......provide excuses for every overage !!
Posted by rushinghjr (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 12:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sounds like the Owhampy Administration and the D. C. DemocRATS!
Posted by bigdaddy101 (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 6:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What did they do to Morgantown Road? I haven't noticed anything different?
Posted by niderbip (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
wait till you see the "final" rec complex budget.
Posted by 2008 (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 9:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This reeks of fiscal irresponsibility not at the DC level but locally.
But oh well, who cares, as long as the Recreational Center is built.
Posted by Sailaway2 (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 9:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Looks like that tax rebate Henry pushed so hard for was just a sham....many of us got about 20 or 30 dollars in savings for a whole year.....wow!! Now we overspend "just a bit" by a million or so? Next time keep the 20 bucks and
reduce the debt. Thanks for NOTHING!! And in the future
if ya just got to raise taxes....give us people who actually work a break....tax food, car tags, or gas....it is a fair way to
distribute the debt. Even people in subsidised housing
drive a car and eat. Property taxes just hit those who are
trying hard to hold on to their homes......
Posted by Hardcorps (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 10:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Overspent by over two million dollars. wonderful
Posted by stateofnatchez (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 6:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sailaway.........."if ya just got to raise taxes....give us people who actually work a break....tax food, car tags, or gas....it is a fair way to distribute the debt. "
------>forget it Sailaway!! Politicians in this town know where the majority vote resides.
Keep this page bookmarked cause you're gonna be surprised next year when they're in the red double what they are this year.
Posted by kooncat (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 8:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There is no excuse for being over budget by $2,000,000.00
(Two Million Dollars) Do they not realize what is takes to pay back that kind of debt. A Two Million Dollar loan @ 5 percent interest for ten years has a loan payment of $21,213.00 per month. But of course they will just vote to raise taxes. Not sure which board is worse at managing money between the BOA and BOS? It is like they are afraid to cut back on spending. Do they really not know what it takes to keep a budget? It sounds as if they just take a wild guess based on the past. I am sorry, but that is not acceptable to the tax payers.
Posted by steve_o (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
While this may be a 1 casino town at present. whats up with the Roth hill people? Put up or shut up I say! I don't believe they should tie up property while they figure out what they are going to do!
Adding another casino would make it a better draw than just having one.
Having 2-3 casinos would make it similiar to a resort area.
Hell, part of Woodville is considered a "resort area"
Posted by steve_o (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 9:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
kooncat, i'm with you on the 2 million thing. But hurricanes, tornados, and tsunamis take a toll on your budget when you didn't expect them.
That's what insurance is for. Do they have any?
Posted by natashakubelikov (anonymous) on November 14, 2009 at 10:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Typical..
Posted by ntzslums (anonymous) on November 15, 2009 at 12:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
When do our city/county leaders come up for re-election???? Clean out the pen in 2010.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)