Comments by Dilbert
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Posted on October 30 at 2:03 p.m.
Yeahuhuh, you have this HUGE problem with typing one thing there by "saying" on here, when in your pea sized brain, you 'claim' to mean something totally different. So yes, I have a hard time understanding anything you are talking about, but I don’t think it is because you are a liberal, I think it is because you talk in gibberish.
I don’t have issue with what you said at all. After coming to these boards for a short time, I have come to expect you to ramble on with a lot of stuff that makes absolutely no sense and then to turn around and argue that you have “proven” yourself right, but actually only proven that you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
So I said “All”? That’s it? That’s the best you can come up with, to come back on me about? See, you should be going for McCain/Palin because they are more attuned to those with special needs, such as yourself.
So I said “All”? Now let’s get to the point. Did Obama disenable the basic security system on credit cards, which has allowed many questionable donations to be sent in to his campaign, which “SOME” (better than all? Yeahuhuh) estimate to be over $300 million? Yes he did. It is a documented fact, just like it is a well document fact that your “MORE honest” candidate has refused to list the people who have donated to his campaign. You can make an argument about me being stupid, because I said “All” but you show yourself to be ignorant by picking something like me saying all, instead of disputing any point I made that your more honest candidate did something questionable, yet again.
Now, “the problem is that I put down what I actually mean and when you do it can't be literally true.”
Are you kidding? You put down what you actually mean? Like when you started bashing Palin on your personal points, but when I said something about it, you came back with what you meant was what the polls were showing? You are the worst person on these boards when it comes to putting down what you actually mean. Well I take that back. I think you put down what you mean, and then someone comes along and shows you to be the idiot you are, and then you come back saying that they misunderstood you because what you really meant was something totally different than anything you posted.
Oh, and my name isn’t based on the character. It is based on my grandmothers’ pet which she loved dearly, not that it is any of your business. Just another dumb attack. Want to start griping about how much money I spent on clothes this month? I know you will find it hard to believe, but there are actually many things named Dilbert, not just the cartoon character. When I think of “Yeahuhuh” I think of someone basically not paying attention, just nodding incoherently and not having any understanding of anything being said. Yeah, the name fits you well.
Posted on October 29 at 6:36 p.m.
Yeahuhuh, just so I understand, you think my name Dilbert is a funny name and your name is "Yeahuhuh". Well that doesn't surprise me, that argument is as far off as anything else you post.
I said, Obama's spending would increase the deficit by over 3 trillion dollars. You then said I was wrong because Obama would actually increase it by 3.4 trillion dollars. Thanks for proving me right?
Then you go on and say that Obama's "economic advisers" say McCain's would increase it by 5 trillion. So, I state non-partisan people saying one thing, which you turn around and back up and then you pipe in to argue with what "Obama's advisers" say? Are you serious? I wonder what they say at Obama.com, guess I need to just get all my facts from there.
Then you say I need to realize how wrong I can be? I never said in my post that 5 trillion wasn't more than 3.4 trillion. I said Obama's spending plan would increase the deficit by over 3 trillion, which you turned around and agreed with. So what exactly were "WE" wrong about? (If I say it and you agree with it, that means we were both wrong)
Did ya'll see in the news where all the illegal people that ACORN registered to vote, have also been found to be donating money to Barack Obama? Seems "Mr. Honest" Obama (according to weird named Yeahuhuh) turned off the security for credit cards that verifies the name on the card matches the address on the file for the card and he has Mickey Mouse donating money to his campaign. So far these donations are about half of his money raised (estimated at 300 million dollars). I'm glad he is so honest and upfront. But at least this explains why he refuses to release the names of his donors.
Posted on October 29 at 11:29 a.m.
charliesangel2008,
First, how do you know the person who did this is a Republican? I know many Democrats who think "Obama sucks" and will not vote for him. So maybe it is not Republican's that are being shallow minded, but maybe it is you.
Second, "BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD OF ANY DEMOCRATA "SPRAY PAINTING" OR REMOVING SIGNS FROM CITIZENS PERSONAL PROPERTY OR BUILDINGS"
You know why you haven't heard about people removing signs from personal property or buildings? Because you don't want to. It has been all over the news. People being caught on video stealing McCain/Palin signs. Once again maybe you are being shallow minded.
Third, "I THINK THE SIMPLE NARROW-MINDED SUPPORTERS OF MCCAIN THAT GET ON THIS WEB-SITE TO DISPERSE THEIR PERSONAL OPINIONS ABOUT OBAMA ARE VERY LOW-CLASS, UNSECURE, JUDGEMENTAL RACIST"
So, just so I understand. If you have a personal opinion about someone who is of a different race than you are, then you are considered to be a racist? Your words on this may not be the most ignorant thing I have ever heard, but it is close. What if you have a personal opinion about someone who is the same race that you are? What does that make you? I mean I don't like Joe Biden either. OH!! What if you don't like them because their stance on abortion, you don't agree with his tax plan, health care, stance on guns, liberal voting record or many other things? Are you still racist? I think this opinion of yours is extremely shallow minded.
Fourth, "OH AND TO YOU 'MUFFINRULES' VANDELS IS CORRECTLY SPELLED VANDALS. INSTEAD OF POSTING IGNORANT COMMENTS AT 04:11A.M, YOU SHOULD BE UP LEARING HOW TO USE CORRECT SPELLING, OR LEARNING HOW TO USE YOUR SPELL CHECK ON YOUR COMPUTER!"
Again, here we go with the shallow minded thing. In your attempt to get onto someone for misspelling words, in this quote alone you misspelled 'learning' as you spelled it "LEARING". You also misspelled Democrat earlier by spelling it "DEMOCRATA". Very shallow minded of you.
Posted on October 28 at 4:45 p.m.
Well after I finished laughing and got to where I could read Yeahuhuh's post again. I got to the part where he said something about with the Democrats will actually pay the bills.
Yeahuhuh, why don't you do something that even Obama can't do. Explain how he is going to pay the bills while introducing one trillion dollars of new spending. He said it was budget neutral because he was cutting as much as he was increasing and therefore it would be no increase.
How very honest of him.
He is the only one that can come up with these numbers. Al Gore invented the internet and Obama must have invented the calculator.
All of the non-partisan people who have studied this have come up with that he will add over $300,000,000,000 to the deficit and he will never be able to pay for the 1 trillion unless he increases taxes on everyone, and increases them by a whole bunch not just a little bit, a lot.
Come on Yeahuhuh, explain what Obama can't.
Posted on October 28 at 4:36 p.m.
Yeahuhuh:
"Obama/Biden will make our government more honest"
As I was sitting here laughing while reading your post, I actually started laughing so hard my eyes watered up at your post when I got to this part.
"Make our government more honest"
Have you lost total control of your senses? You must have to make a statement such as this.
As an Illinois State Senator, Obama promised to lower taxes on the middle class. Did he? No
Did he even make an attempt, introduce legislation, anything to help lower taxes? No
How very honest of him.
As an Illinois State Senator, Obama filled out a questionnaire about banning hand guns in which he said he would support the banning of handguns. This questionnaire was filled out in his own hand writing, but now Obama said he never, ever has supported the banning of handguns.
How very honest of him.
Obama in one of his talks said that Iran was a tiny country and poised no threat because they spent only 1/10th of what the USA spent on the military. The next day he said Iran posed a grave threat. When asked about saying it was a tiny country, Obama said he never said that, that his quote was taken out of context. Then it was played again in its entirety and was quite clear it was not out of context, Obama was out of his mind.
How honest of him.
When asked about Rev Wrights sermons? Obama stated he didn't ever hear anything like that while he was there.
How very honest of him.
When asked about Tony Rezko, Obama said he did a couple hours legal work for him, but never had direct dealings with him.
How very honest of him.
When asked about Ayers, Obama said he was "Just some guy in the neighborhood".
How very honest of him.
I could go on all day.....
Yeahuhuh, you have one screwed up sense of honesty.
Posted on October 25 at 7:01 p.m.
southernwoman,
I'm not Baptist so I can't tell you what they encourage. I do happen to know many Baptist's and I know that most of them have problems with abortion, while Obama doesn't, in any way shape or form. Even allowing children to have them without letting their parents know. There are some strong family values for you.
I don't pretend to know what faith Obama is. I don't personally know him, I'm not nearly radical enough, haven't bombed any US sites (Ayers), brought about genocide (Odinga), preached hate (Wright) or anything else that would draw him to me. Once again strong family values.
But a man who marries a woman, who inherited a fortune, doesn't have strong family values in your opinion? I guess since you have such strong family values, if you inherited $150,000,000 you wouldn't take it and if you did take it, that should automatically rule out any chance of a man wanting to marry you, because if he does marry you, that means he doesn’t have strong family values either? If you say you wouldn't take the money, I will be forced to call you a liar, so I hope you don't say you wouldn't.
A label reserved for WASPs only? Unreal..
At least when the person called Obama that, McCain stopped his speech and made a statement about it, even though he was Boooooo'd by his own supporters.
What did Obama do when his supporters came to his rally with T-shirts that read: 'Bros Before Hos' when he was going against Hilary? Nothing.
What did Obama do when his supporters showed up at his rally with t-shirts that read "Sarah Palin is a C***"? Nothing.
Posted on October 25 at 4:51 p.m.
southernwoman..
What do you have against Baptists? Much less Baptists that have a 150+ million beer fortune? I don't even almost understand your point.
Religion may not be the aurgement you want to go with to compare Obama & McCain.
Although you can argue any way you want. You just leave out any and all facts that are negative to Obama. Makes sense to me.
Posted on October 25 at 2:45 p.m.
toosweetlej
"He is a weird looking short armed jerk without a plan"
Did you eat paint chips as a child? Live under high voltage power lines? His arms are like that because almost every bone in his body has been broken while he served this country. He was a POW for longer than Obama has served in the US Senate.
No plan? Go to an independent, non-partisan site and get a clue. They all say the same thing, Obama's tax plan that he sprouts off with 95% of people getting their taxes lowered is a joke. It is not even remotely true. Not even just a little bit. The only "plan" he has sprouted off so far is increase taxes and increase spending. Fantastic plan.
Posted on October 24 at 4:54 p.m.
For the week of (10/6/08-10/12/08)
According to Nielsen Media Research, Fox News averaged 3.4 million viewers in prime time last week, beating out TBS (3.3 million), USA (2.8 million), and ESPN (2.6 million) for the top spot. CNN placed fifth, averaging 2.4 million viewers in prime time, while MSNBC placed ninth, averaging 1.6 million viewers in prime time.
Fox News placed second only to Nickelodeon in total-day ratings, averaging 1.5 million viewers to Nickelodeon's 2.1 million viewers. CNN placed ninth in total day ratings, averaging 1.0 million viewers, while MSNBC came in 15th, averaging 685 million viewers.
There ya go Yeahuhuh seems like your MSNBC really put it to Fox News. I just emailed O'Riely and I put your name in for Pinhead & Patriots. Oh, I didn't put you in for Patriot by the way.
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Posted on October 30 at 6:48 p.m.
Yeahuhuh.
My rage? You are an idiot.
I don't assume anything. I pointed out some facts, you didn't like them because they are negative to the person you support for President, you went off on one of your rants that is filled with a whole lot of nothing.
It has been well documented, although not on MSNBC, so I am sure you missed it. Many of the people donating to his campaign are using pre-paid credit cards and gift cards. What is the problem with this I am sure you will ask.
"The problem with such cards, campaign finance lawyers said, is that they make it impossible to tell whether foreign nationals, donors who have exceeded the limits, government contractors or others who are barred from giving to a federal campaign are making contributions"
"the Republicans -- with help from folks like you -- throw crap at their opponents to make the other guys appear demonic"
Well I guess since I left out McCain's increasing the deficit in our earlier talk and you took "issue" with it, I guess I can take issue with the fact that you have left out that Obama is throwing more crap than anyone. It has been very well pointed out that Obama is spending a lot more money on negative ads than McCain. It has been very well pointed out that Obama is showing more negative ads than McCain. By you purposely leaving this out, and then saying that the Republicans are throwing crap, shows how stupid you are. To take one of your lines.
On Obama gets a different kind of chilly reception