Comments by Harmony
Page 1 of 1
Posted on July 22 at 2:57 p.m.
Hey st8player37--do you happen to know that there is a difference between stereotyping and stating the truth?
Hunting does NOT work. If it did then it would not be required year after year after year. There are STILL several thousands of DVA's every year. There are STILL deer that starve to death year after year. To add to that list, there are human lives senselessly destroyed via lousy shots---without hunting there would be ZERO human fatalities and injuries due to hunting accidents. That is a FACT. Hunting does NOT work and only causes increase in the herd year after year and it causes human deaths as well as countless needless animal deaths.
Now, are you also saying I am stereotyping when I state that you are a bloodthirsty killer? Emphasizing, or slightly exaggerating perhaps, but calling you a bloodthirsty killer is far more suiting then saying you "respect" deer by invading their territory, seek out the strong and healthy of them and then proceed to snuff the life out of them. Sorry bud, you are in the tiny minority --less than 7% of US citizens get a kick out of murdering animals. Your numbers are dwindling, and non hunting citizens are becoming more aware of the deceit that they have been fed in order to pacify them into being falsely led to believe it it 'necessary'.
BTW, just because something is considered "legal" does not mean it is right. People are working towards abolishing hunting forever.
Posted on July 22 at 12:57 p.m.
Hey guy2co~It appears that hunting does not eliminate DVA's according to your very own words. If anything, hunting only encourages deer to reproduce and therefore assures more moving "targets" for the likes of you and your animal murdering ilk. If in fact hunting did actually minimize the population, it would not be necessary year after year---seems as though you hunters are not doing a very good "job" aye?
Here's a fact that hunters do not want the non hunting public to know~ if an impregnated doe can not find enough food sources to sustain herself and future offspring, she has the ability to actually re absorb the embryo and therefore not give birth in the spring. What a great and truly natural form of birth/population control huh? Unfortunately, with no thanks to the mass murder that takes place in a short period of time every year and wipes out large numbers of the herd, the deer instinctively reproduce to replace their herd---therefore making more animals for you and your ilk to murder year after year.
You are apparently just another bloodthirsty killer who enjoys snuffing out the life from beautiful HEALTHY animals and you will use any excuse to try and condone what you do.
BTW, I obviously do not care whether you like what I write or not---there's a tremendous difference in my writing words on a blog and you going out and murdering beautiful healthy animals for "sport".
Posted on July 21 at 1:16 a.m.
I agree with DavidKveragas 100%.
Also, how ridiculous to compare the sports "badminton and ping pong" to an activity that involves the use of a weapon that is used for the sole purpose of killing an animal! Hunters seem to have a sly way of trying to make light of what they do. For instance they often say "harvest" rather than kill (I do believe that the term "murder" actually applies well). The term "humane kill" is also used often amongst hunters. When someone is killing a perfectly healthy animal, there is absolutely nothing humane about it.
Isn't it odd how the general public has been led to believe that hunting is supposed to be a means of "controlling" the deer population and yet after several decades of hunting, it doesn't ever improve? I don't recall this article mentioning the need for the hunters "services" to keep the population under control----did they forget to mention this little deception that has been used to pacify the non hunting citizens for all these years of needless bloodshed of beautiful healthy wildlife?? It appears that hunting does nothing more than assure that the killers will have an ample number of moving targets year after year, and it's time that the 93%+ of the non hunting citizens are informed of the truth behind the sick blood lust sport.
Don't be fooled by the lies and myths. Deer do suffer and regardless of what hunters will say, deer still starve to death. Hunters do not seek the weak deer but rather they seek the strongest and likely the healthiest of the herd. The myth of "deer will starve and die if we don't hunt" is a crock. If they cared about starving deer, then why do they not have the hunting season take place during the time of year that this is most likely going to occur and they can seek the weak starving deer and "harvest" them while also ending their suffering?
Hunting is nothing more than a sick "sport" for those who derive pleasure in killing beautiful healthy animals. It needs to be abolished!
Page 1 of 1
Posted on July 25 at 12:01 a.m.
guy2co~ Like the majority of delusional hunters, you seem to not comprehend that you are in a tiny minority. Unlike you and your ilk, the majority of sane, sensible, intelligent people do not get a thrill out of murdering beautiful healthy animals, and they are intelligent and compassionate enough to find non violent ways to relieve stress and/or enjoy a hobby that does not inflict pain, suffering and death to animals --or humans for that matter. It seems as though you have a difficult time in grasping the truth of the matter. You are in the tiny minority of people who actually enjoy snuffing the life out of beautiful healthy animals----and your numbers are dwindling.
Now, to relieve the stress you likely feel just from reading my post, if it is daylight--why don't you go for a walk armed with a camera and take some pictures of any wildlife and other beautiful sites of nature that you encounter? It will do you good and there won't even be any bloodshed---if you can even fathom that. Good day.
On Hunting made ethical