Comments by niderbip
Page 1 of 24 | Next
Posted on November 18 at 5:52 a.m.
it's in the same folder that contains the calculations they used to arrive at the $5.5 million "rec concept budget".
Posted on November 17 at 2:39 p.m.
Yep. these are just the people i'd put in charge of $5.5 million bucks.
Posted on November 14 at 8:11 a.m.
wait till you see the "final" rec complex budget.
Posted on November 9 at 5:28 a.m.
"how will the recreation complex be funded..."
increased taxes. the county doesn't 'pay' for the complex; taxpayers do.
Posted on November 8 at 9:46 p.m.
it's certainly not his fault if he's 'the only one talking'.
Posted on November 6 at 7:24 a.m.
it's not negative; it's called prudent fiscal practices.
many put more effort and research into buying a $20k car, but maybe that just doesn't bother you.
let me lay this out for you: a good start would be to REQUIRE the use of Excel when discussing budgets/costs.
Posted on November 6 at 6:05 a.m.
it'd have been nice to have at least one superstar/powerplayer/leader who actually prepared a proper budget.
anyone ever research how much it actually costs to build and maintain a swimming pool?
Posted on November 5 at 9:41 a.m.
Well said...these may be the same people who agree the participants in the Boston Tea Party were "right-wing zealots".
I don't find my efforts "wasted", just a different opinion.
Did you ever ask how much "economic impact" all the conventions the 'new' 9 holes at DP actually had?
That was how it was sold.
Posted on November 5 at 9:14 a.m.
YHH -
you may see it as whining; others see it as reality. And how much does "the study your vote funded" cost?
Let me guess: they didn't give that number either.
Page 1 of 24 | Next
Posted on November 18 at 5:59 a.m.
in this day and age, it seems that people are looking for 'free' capital...a government (not local, either) grant.
On Balance stagnation with initiative