World has two different radical rights
Published 12:25 am Thursday, June 21, 2007
One of the “fear and smear” mantras of the secular socialists (modern liberals) is how the “radical right” (their term of course) is so extreme, and such a threat to the country and so on. If one looks at the Christian right (their term) it most likely would be quite satisfied if:
1. Abortion was illegal (up for adoption instead)
2. The Ten Commandments were displayed in all public schools
3. Legal marriage would be heterosexual
4. Fornication families would not get tax money
5. Your tax money could follow you to any school
6. TV-movies would clean up their act and also treat Christianity fairly.
Well, that’s so radical so absurd. Now let’s look at “that other radical right” which is Islamic-Shariah law. Do you dare to list what this radical right would probably be quite satisfied with today?
How about some hints?
1. All women will be covered, silent and not vote
2. Adulterers will be stoned
3. No pork or pig in American diets or stores
4. All people will pray five times daily (after washing feet)
5. Christians/Jews and others will be tagged doomed “infidels” dealt with harshly
6. Numerous public school policy-procedure changes (already begun)
7. All schools will teach Islam
8. All people will dress in Islamic garb (even hospital gowns)
9. Public executions-maiming according to Sharia Law.
Do you now understand the two Radical Right groups?
The bizzare obvious observable conclusion these days is that the modern liberals (Democrats) see one of these groups as “cultural terrorists” and the other as “misunderstood victims.”
The modern liberal bashes one group with glee but is deathly (it fits) afraid of the other so panders on bent knee to it while pretending they “don’t mean what they say or do.”
I ask you, which “radical right” agenda do you choose … if you had any choice at all?
Do you want the Democrats to choose for you?
Doug Schnexnayder
Vidalia resident