Gonzales Faces Questions About Wiretaps
Published 12:00 am Monday, December 26, 2005
WASHINGTON – Attorney General Alberto Gonzales came under new questioning Thursday about President Bush’s wiretapping program and the administration response to congressional subpoenas.
In a closed-door session, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Silvestre Reyes said members were especially interested in the reasons behind Gonzales’ controversial 2004 visit to the hospital bedside of John Ashcroft, reportedly to pressure the ailing attorney general to endorse Bush’s surveillance program. Ashcroft, said to have been barely conscious at the time, refused.
Gonzales did not express any regret, Reyes said after the hearing ended.
“He, I thought, explained it very well in terms of why they had gone there,” said Reyes, D-Texas, declining to provide specifics because many details are classified.
Ranking Republican Pete Hoekstra urged Congress to move on from speculation over the hospital visit, which he likened to a discussion of “exactly what (flavor) Jell-O Ashcroft was eating in the hospital.”
Details of the hospital visit, first revealed in congressional testimony by former Deputy Attorney General James Comey, intensified calls by Democrats and some Republicans for Gonzales’ resignation. The attorney general has shown no signs that he will step down.
Democrats aren’t done with him, however. In a letter to Gonzales on Thursday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and other Democrats demanded to know whether a Justice Department memo declaring presidential aides absolutely immune from subpoenas was drafted legally.
That issue concerns demands by lawmakers for testimony from such advisers as former presidential counsel Harriet Miers.
The deadline for Gonzales’ answer: Monday, 24 hours before he is to testify publicly before the panel about an assortment of controversial Justice Department matters.
Democrats say the tale of the hospital visit is important because it shows the extent to which the administration will exert executive power over questions of whether civil liberties are being protected.
According to Comey, he and Ashcroft had refused to recertify the legality of the surveillance program before the attorney general fell ill with pancreatitis. On the eve of a deadline, Gonzales and then-White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card sought to go over Comey’s head to Ashcroft, then in intensive care recovering from surgery. What followed was the dramatic scene at Ashcroft’s bedside, Comey said.
During the closed-door meeting Thursday, Gonzales revealed new details about the circumstances of the visit, Reyes told reporters. Reyes could not repeat many of them because the surveillance program is classified. Gonzales did not comment as he entered and exited the building.
But Reyes said he was satisfied with Gonzales’ explanation and cautioned against drawing conclusions.
“When there are issues of national security at stake, I think certainly one should not question the motivation of individuals,” Reyes told reporters. “I’m willing to accept the rationale behind it.”
Hoekstra, meanwhile, urged lawmakers to move on to more pressing matters, such as how to strike the right balance between fighting terrorism with domestic surveillance and protecting civil liberties.
“Trying to figure out exactly what Jell-o Ashcroft was eating in the hospital _ whether it was lime, or whether it was raspberry or cherry flavor _ really doesn’t contribute anything to this discussion at this point in time,” said Hoekstra, R-Mich. “The issue now is not where we were three, four years ago. The issue is where we are today.”
On the Net:
Justice Department: http://www.usdoj.gov
A service of the Associated Press(AP)